NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM88751 Query DataSets for GSM88751
Status Public on Jun 07, 2007
Title SAM vs seedling_11M
Sample type RNA
 
Channel 1
Source name Shoot apical meristem (SAM) and very young leaf primordia (P0 and P1). A SAM is comprised of pluripotent stem cells, which divide to regenerate themselves as well as to provide cells to form other organs such as leaves and stems.
Organism Zea mays
Characteristics Inbred line: B73
Developmental stage: Vegetative SAMs from 14-day old seedlings
Sample name: SAM5
Growth protocol Maize (Zea mays inbred line B73) kernels were planted ~2 cm deep in plastic pots (8.5 cm x 8.5 cm wide at the top and 7.5 cm deep) filled with SB 300 Universal (Sun Gro Horticulture). Pots were placed in an environmental control room (PGW-40, Percival Scientific). The light intensity at the growth medium surface was kept between 830 to 860 mol/m2s as measured with a quantum meter (Model QMSW, Apogee Instruments). Temperature and light cycles were set at 25C with 15-hour light conditions and at 20C with 9-hour dark conditions. Pots were watered with a solution containing 0.7 mM calcium nitrate. After 14 days SAMs and seedlings were collected from the same batch of plants.
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol The PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Arcturus) was used to extract total RNA from the maize SAMs collected with LCM according to the manual. The RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (Stratagene) on column using the DNase Incubation Buffer provided with PALM RNA ExtractionKit (P.A.L.M. Microlaser Technologies) according to the manual of PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit. About 10 ng of the Dnase I-treated RNA samples were then amplified with T7 RNA polymerase-based (T7-based) RNA amplification according to the method of Nakazono et al. (2003, Plant Cell 15: 583-596) except that amplified RNA was purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit and that after the second strand synthesis cDNA was purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The procedure is also available at our project website (http://maize-meristems.plantgenomics.iastate.edu/index.html).
Label Cy3
Label protocol Two micrograms of amplified RNA was labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 according to Nakazono et al. (2003, Plant Cell 15: 583-596) with slight modifications. Details of fluorescent target synthesis are available at our project website (http://maize-meristems.plantgenomics.iastate.edu/index.html). To remove dye-specific effects in the statistical analyses, Cy dyes were swapped between the RNA samples with odd and even numbers.
 
Channel 2
Source name Above ground part of seedlings
Organism Zea mays
Characteristics Inbred line: B73
Developmental stage: 14-day old seedlings
Sample name: Seedling5
Growth protocol the same as ch1
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Six whole seedlings without roots (14-day old, 30 to 40 g) were ground in liquid nitrogen and mixed thoroughly with 360 mL of a solution consisting of 38% [v/v] phenol in saturated buffer (pH 4.3 + 0.2, Fisher Scientific), 0.8 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.4 M ammonium thiocyanate, 0.1 M sodium acetate [pH 5], 5% [v/v] glycerol. Half of the mixture (about 200 mL) was transferred to a 250 mL centrifuging tube and centrifuged at 12,000g at 4oC for 20 min. The cleared homogenate solution was transferred to a new tube and incubated at room temperature for 25 min. Then, 36 mL of chloroform was added and shaken vigorously for 15 sec followed by 10 min incubation at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000g at 4oC for 30 min and the aqueous phase (about 110 mL) was transferred to a new tube. Then, 36 ml of isopropanol and 36 mL of 0.8 M sodium citrate/1.2 M sodium chloride were added, mixed well and incubated at room temperature for 15 min followed by a centrifugation at 12,000g at 4oC for 20 min to have RNA pellet at the bottom of the tube. The RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol and the tube was centrifuged again at 7,500g at 4oC for 8 min. After removing the ethanol, the pellet was air-dried for 30 min at room temperature. The RNA was resuspended with 1.8 mL of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated water at 60oC for 15 min. The RNA solution was transferred into two 1.7-mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 12,000g at 4oC for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to new tubes. Five to 30 g of the RNA samples were taken and cleaned up according to the RNA purification step in the RNA amplification procedure (see below). Ten nano-gram of the cleaned up RNA samples were then amplified with T7 RNA polymerase-based (T7-based) RNA amplification according to the method of Nakazono et al. (2003, Plant Cell 15: 583-596) except that amplified RNA was purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit and that after the second strand synthesis cDNA was purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The procedure is also available at our project website (http://maize-meristems.plantgenomics.iastate.edu/index.html). Seeding1.1 and Seedling1.2, and Seedling4.1 and Seedling4.2, and Seedling6.1 and Seedling6.2 were amplified from the same RNA pools, respectively.
Label Cy5
Label protocol the same as ch1
 
 
Hybridization protocol Microarray slides were prehybridized in 5X SSC (1X SSC is 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate), 0.1% SDS, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin at 42oC for 45 min, then rinsed with autoclaved, Millipore water, dipped in isopropanol, and dried by centrifugation. Each target was resuspended in 30 l hybridization solution (5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.2 g/l of yeast tRNA, 0.2 g/l of polyadenylic acid, 25% super-pure (99.5%) formamide (Fisher Scientific). Targets hybridized to the same slide were mixed, heated at 95oC for 3 min, collected by centrifugation, applied to a prehybridized microarray slide and covered with a 24 x 60 mm LiferSlip (Erie Scientific Company). Ten microliters of 3X SSC were added to each of the two slots of the hybridization chamber (TeleChem). The array was then sealed, submerged in a 42oC water bath and incubated for 12 to 18 h. Subsequently, each array was washed in 1X SSC and 0.2% SDS for two minutes, 0.1X SSC and 0.2% SDS for two minutes, and 0.1X SSC for two minutes, followed by a quick rinse in autoclaved, Millipore water. Arrays were then dried via centrifugation. This hybridization procedure is also available at our project website (http://maize-meristems.plantgenomics.iastate.edu/index.html).
Scan protocol Fluorescence of Cy3 and Cy5 on slides was detected at 10-micron resolution with a ScanArray 5000 (Packard). The following setting was used as initial laser power and PMT gain, respectively: 82 and 63 for Cy3 and 77 and 58 for Cy5. These values were slightly adjusted depending on slides to have enough signals for the lowest scans and to have approximately the same amounts of signals between the two channels for the majority of the spots. For each successive scan, laser power and PMT gain were increased by two to three units and three to four units, respectively. Each slide was scanned seven times. Subsequently, three scans (“low”, “medium” and “high” laser power and PMT) for each slide were selected for statistical analyses.
Description RNA was isolated from six to ten LCM-collected SAMs using PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Arcturus) as per manufacturer’s instructions to generate one biological replication. RNA was also isolated from six above-ground portions of seedlings using “home made Trizol” solution (see full protocol description of extract for details) to generate one biological replication. In total, six biological replications were prepared. Approximately 10 ng of total RNA from each biological replication were used as starting material for T7-based linear RNA amplification, performed as described by Nakazono et al. (2003, Plant Cell 15: 583-596). Each biological replication yielded between 10 and 50 g of amplified RNA (aRNA). Two micrograms of aRNA for each sample was indirectly labeled with Cy dye and hybridized to the GPL2572 platforms.
Data processing Spots were removed for bad PCR and empty on the microarrays. All data were background corrected and then an R implementation of the lowess normalization method (Dudoit and Fridlyand, 2002, Genome Biol: 3 RESEARCH0036) was used to normalize the two channels for each combination of slide and scan intensity. The data were centered around 0 for each slide. Subsequently, the data from each scan was used to conduct a mixed linear model analysis separately for each of 30,382 spots using a strategy similar to that of Wolfinger et al. (2001, J Comput Biol 8: 625-637).
 
Submission date Dec 20, 2005
Last update date Jun 06, 2007
Contact name Patrick S. Schnable
E-mail(s) [email protected]
Phone 515-294-0975
Organization name Iowa State University
Street address 2035B Roy J Carver Co-Lab
City Ames
State/province IA
ZIP/Postal code 50011
Country USA
 
Platform ID GPL2572
Series (2)
GSE4004 Global gene expression in the maize shoot apical meristem
GSE6267 A global gene expression analysis in the shoot apical meristem of maize (Zea mays L.)

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE -[INV_VALUE]
Ch1_Signal Mean Pixel intensity avaeraged over the local signal region for green channel (Cy3)
Ch1_Background Mean Pixel intensity avaeraged over the local background region for green channel (Cy3)
Ch1_Signal Median Median pixel intensity computed over the local signal region for green channel (Cy3)
Ch1_Background Median Median pixel intensity computed over the local background region for green channel (Cy3)
Ch2_Signal Mean Pixel intensity avaeraged over the local signal region for red channel (Cy5)
Ch2_Background Mean Pixel intensity avaeraged over the local background region for red channel (Cy5)
Ch2_Signal Median Median pixel intensity computed over the local signal region for red channel (Cy5)
Ch2_Background Median Median pixel intensity computed over the local background region for red channel (Cy5)
Ch1_norm Background corrected and normalized log value of green channel(Cy3)
Ch2_norm Background corrected and normalized log value of red channel(Cy5)
INV_VALUE Normalized log ratio value of background corrected intensities of red channel and green channel

Data table
ID_REF VALUE Ch1_Signal Mean Ch1_Background Mean Ch1_Signal Median Ch1_Background Median Ch2_Signal Mean Ch2_Background Mean Ch2_Signal Median Ch2_Background Median Ch1_norm Ch2_norm INV_VALUE
1 -0.344488 1470.6888 167.3944 1159 18 1605.2736 123.1343 1399 63 6.947116 7.291604 0.344488
2 -0.00312 17856.8886 216.8344 17167.5 73 21067.25 174.0659 15387.5 80.5 9.68979 9.69291 0.00312
3 -1.40282 2908.5625 170.9974 2812.5 36 9630.1796 161.095 9721.5 76.5 7.850393 9.253213 1.40282
4 -0.989436 1336.741 192.2822 1168 55 2602.5583 115.6098 2552.5 40.5 6.927754 7.91719 0.989436
5 -1.05649 5676.5068 169.675 2682 32 10970.8769 130.6167 6577.5 55.5 7.804644 8.861138 1.056494
6 0.225434 4626.2407 207.1563 3871 91 3497.8 115.3269 2606.5 51.5 8.154688 7.929254 -0.225434
7 0.075603 5570.8471 242.6961 5105 79 4980.2714 124.8479 4054 47 8.447115 8.371512 -0.075603
8 -0.900723 1887.5372 178.561 1691 27 3778.2463 121.3072 3484 48 7.329606 8.230329 0.900723
9 -1.30066 1739.1437 192.5852 1376.5 64 4842.038 179.706 4126 82 7.092511 8.393176 1.300665
10 -1.17388 1812.7421 200.0174 1634 59 4479.4897 143.7786 4360 81 7.275239 8.449115 1.173876
11 -0.634795 2021.3068 200.286 1939 47 2914.375 127.25 3046 52 7.457911 8.092706 0.634795
12 -0.792653 3141.1147 220.9036 3029.5 99.5 5330.1601 160.1226 5623 99 7.903742 8.696395 0.792653
13 -1.47956 4875.9248 224.0035 4629 91 15469.2431 163.1793 17247.5 71.5 8.346114 9.825674 1.47956
14 -0.378294 6126.5654 192.5917 6225 65.5 7792.3691 133.0269 7723 61 8.645889 9.024183 0.378294
15 -1.23743 1885.41 177.9031 1811.5 20 5059.5913 189.7934 5317 90 7.40786 8.64529 1.23743
16 -1.09876 1324.9396 174.6321 1031 51 3486.9729 112.2493 2515 47 6.800688 7.899453 1.098765
17 -0.540966 5487.6176 209.6722 5270 71 8128.27 166.2857 7662 68 8.475347 9.016313 0.540966
18 -0.149 3913.9306 231.4228 3633 76.5 4773.25 176.6359 3584.5 80 8.094951 8.243951 0.149
19 -2.07558 1578.7937 171.182 1514.5 34 9743.2294 128.9802 10109.5 71 7.219759 9.295334 2.075575
20 -0.92723 2411.8979 215.4244 2168.5 68.5 4784.7631 179.9941 4563 69.5 7.566774 8.494004 0.92723

Total number of rows: 14080

Table truncated, full table size 1270 Kbytes.




Supplementary data files not provided

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap