NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM1267114 Query DataSets for GSM1267114
Status Public on Jun 23, 2014
Title IFO1802
Sample type genomic
 
Channel 1
Source name IFO1802, YPD, 24h
Organism Saccharomyces kudriavzevii
Characteristics strain: IFO1802
Growth protocol Yeast strains were cultivated in 5ml YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose), at 28 ºC for 24 hours
Extracted molecule genomic DNA
Extraction protocol DNA was isolated according to standard procedures (Querol et al., 1992). After isolation the DNAs were digested with HinfI (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) and purified with High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany).
Label Cy3,Cy5
Label protocol Approximately 2 μg of these DNAs were labelled with fluorescently-tagged nucleotides (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA), either Cy3-dCTP or Cy-5 dCTP for the reference and the studied strains, using Exo-Klenow Fragment and random primer Mix (Bioprime Array CGH Kit, Invitrogen). Dye-swap hybridizations were performed for each strain. After labeling, the reactions were heatinactivated, the experimental (Cy5 or Cy3-labeled) and reference (Cy3 or Cy5-labeled) DNAs were mixed and purified away from unincorporated label using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (QUIAGEN). The degree of labeling was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm and at 550 nm for Cy3- labelled DNA or at 260 nm and 650 nm for Cy5-labeled DNA. Samples with a base/dye ratio between 40 and 80 for both Cy3 and Cy5, were routinely obtained.
 
Channel 2
Source name S288C, YPD, 24h
Organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Characteristics reference strain: S288C
Growth protocol Yeast strains were cultivated in 5ml YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose), at 28 ºC for 24 hours
Extracted molecule genomic DNA
Extraction protocol DNA was isolated according to standard procedures (Querol et al., 1992). After isolation the DNAs were digested with HinfI (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) and purified with High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany).
Label Cy5,Cy3
Label protocol Approximately 2 μg of these DNAs were labelled with fluorescently-tagged nucleotides (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA), either Cy3-dCTP or Cy-5 dCTP for the reference and the studied strains, using Exo-Klenow Fragment and random primer Mix (Bioprime Array CGH Kit, Invitrogen). Dye-swap hybridizations were performed for each strain. After labeling, the reactions were heatinactivated, the experimental (Cy5 or Cy3-labeled) and reference (Cy3 or Cy5-labeled) DNAs were mixed and purified away from unincorporated label using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (QUIAGEN). The degree of labeling was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm and at 550 nm for Cy3- labelled DNA or at 260 nm and 650 nm for Cy5-labeled DNA. Samples with a base/dye ratio between 40 and 80 for both Cy3 and Cy5, were routinely obtained.
 
 
Hybridization protocol The mixture of the required Cy3 and Cy5 labelled samples was adjusted to 60 μl with hybridization solution (50% formamide, 5X SSC, 0,1% SDS, 100 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA and water) incubated for 1 minute at 95 ºC and centrifuged at 13000 X g for 1 min. The supernatants were applied to microarrays and the hybridizations were allowed to proceed overnight at 65°C.
Scan protocol Arrays scanned using an Axon GenePix 4100A scanner and GenePix Pro 6.0 software
Description the dyes indicated in each raw file were the dyes employed for the labelling of the strains.
Data processing Using Acuity 4.0 software (Molecular Devices Corp., Union City, CA, USA), manually flagged bad spots were eliminated and the local background was subtracted before averaging the replicate features on the array. Log2 intensity ratios (M values) were then Median normalized to correct for differences in genomic DNA labelling efficiency between samples. The relative hybridization signal of each ORF was derived from the average of the two dye-swap hybridizations performed for each strain. The normalized log2 ratio (M value) was considered as a measure of the relative abundance of each ORF relatively to that of the reference strain S288C. Deviations from the 1:1 hybridization ratio were taken as indicative of changes in DNA copy number. Given that the variability usually observed between S. cerevisiae genomes, (either within laboratory strains or natural isolates), is much lower than this estimate (Adams et al. 1992, Carreto et al. 2008), we interpreted statistically significant variations in hybridization signal as ORF deletions or duplications. Data imported from Acuity was manipulated and clustered, using established algorithms implemented in the software program Genesis. Average linkage clustering with centered correlation was used to generate visual representations of clusters.
 
Submission date Nov 18, 2013
Last update date Jun 24, 2014
Contact name Amparo Gamero
E-mail(s) [email protected]
Organization name IATA-CSIC
Department Food Biotechnology
Street address Avda. Agustín Escardino 7
City Paterna
State/province Valencia
ZIP/Postal code 46980
Country Spain
 
Platform ID GPL13945
Series (1)
GSE52446 Molecular Analysis of the Genes Involved in Aroma Synthesis in the Species S. cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and S. bayanus var. uvarum in Winemaking

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE Normalized log2 ratio representing test/control of two replicates

Data table
ID_REF VALUE
YAL001C 1.764
YAL002W 3.488
YAL003W -1.806
YAL004W -0.059
YAL005C -1.918
YAL007C -0.773
YAL008W 1.867
YAL009W -0.886
YAL010C
YAL011W 0.319
YAL012W 0.046
YAL013W 0.189
YAL014C 1.168
YAL015C -0.794
YAL016W 0.356
YAL017W -0.345
YAL018C 1.099
YAL019W 1.526
YAL020C 0.054
YAL021C -0.205

Total number of rows: 6187

Table truncated, full table size 87 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM1267114_IFO1802_Cy3.gpr.gz 659.5 Kb (ftp)(http) GPR
GSM1267114_IFO1802_Cy5.gpr.gz 1.3 Mb (ftp)(http) GPR
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap