Table 19Change in Adjusted ZBI Score Throughout the Study Period Among Groupsa (ITT Analysis)

Interventions and comparisonsZBI slope estimateb ± SE95% CIP value
FTF PM slope−2.49 ± 1.64−5.85 to 0.87.14
Online PM slope−3.44 ± 1.40−6.31 to −0.57.02
Textbook-only slope−1.26 ± 1.37−4.06 to 1.54.36
FTF PM slope vs online PM slope0.95 ± 2.16−3.47 to 5.38.66
FTF PM slope vs textbook-only slope−1.23 ± 2.12−5.58 to 3.11.57
Online PM slope vs textbook-only slope−2.18 ± 1.96−6.19 to 1.82.27

Abbreviations: FTF, face to face; ITT, intention to treat; PM, peer mentoring; ZBI, Zarit Burden Interview.

aAdjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, age quartile, marital status, education, employment status, and rural/urban location.

bThe slope estimates represent the change in scores in standard points over 18 months.

From: Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers

Cover of Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers
Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers [Internet].
Ghahramani N, Kraschnewski JL, Lengerich EJ, et al.
Copyright © 2020. Pennsylvania State University Hershey Medical Center. All Rights Reserved.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License which permits noncommercial use and distribution provided the original author(s) and source are credited. (See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.