Table 14Change in PAM Among Groups by Sex (ITT Analysis)

Interventions and comparisonsMaleFemale
Slope estimatea ± SE95% CIP valueSlope estimatea ± SE95% CIP value
FTF PM−2.46 ± 1.73−5.91 to 0.98.166.24 ± 2.331.57-10.90.01
Online PM7.44 ± 1.594.28-10.61<.00013.35 ± 2.52−1.69 to 8.39.19
Textbook only−2.19 ± 1.69−5.54 to 1.16.202.45 ± 2.72−2.98 to 7.89.37
FTF PM vs online PM−9.91 ± 2.35−14.58 to −5.23<.00012.89 ± 3.44−4.00 to 9.77.40
FTF PM vs textbook only−0.27 ± 2.41−5.07 to 4.52.913.78 ± 3.57−3.36 to 10.93.29
Online PM vs textbook only9.63 ± 2.315.03-14.24<.00010.90 ± 3.72−6.54 to 8.33.81

Abbreviations: FTF, face to face; ITT, intention to treat; PAM, Patient Activation Measure; PM: peer mentoring.

aThe slope estimates represent the change in scores in standard points over 18 months.

From: Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers

Cover of Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers
Comparing Three Ways to Improve Quality of Life for Patients with Kidney Disease and Their Caregivers [Internet].
Ghahramani N, Kraschnewski JL, Lengerich EJ, et al.
Copyright © 2020. Pennsylvania State University Hershey Medical Center. All Rights Reserved.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License which permits noncommercial use and distribution provided the original author(s) and source are credited. (See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.