Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0265901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265901

Silencing LncRNA CASC9 inhibits proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by MiR-542-3p/ILK

Heping Zhang 1,#, Jingfang Wang 2,#, Taoyuan Yu 3, Jingmin Wang 4, Jun Lu 5, Zongyang Yu 6,*
Editor: Bing-Hua Jiang7
PMCID: PMC9012350  PMID: 35427373

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks the third in cancers and the second in the reasons of cancer-related death. More evidence indicates that long non-coding RNA participates in tumor initiation and progression. It’s known that cancer susceptibility candidate 9 is an oncogenic long non-coding RNA in CRC. miR-542-3p is a negative regulator of CRC, while integrin-linked kinase could contribute to tumor progression and chemoresistance. However, the correlation among long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9, miR-542-3p and integrin-linked kinase in CRC is still unclear. We demonstrated long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 in CRC specimens and cell lines overexpressed via real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Once long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 was knocked down, it significantly inhibited proliferation, invasion, and migration of CRC cells in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, cell counting kit-8, 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine, and transwell assays, which also was validated in vivo. Long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p in a targeted manner, and the function of up-regulated miR-542-3p was confirmed similarly. While miR-542-3p negatively regulates integrin-linked kinase. Thus, we further verified that overexpression of integrin-linked kinase on down-regulated long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 or up-regulated miR-542-3p significantly restored CRC cell proliferation via bioinformatic analysis, dual-luciferase report assay, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA immunoprecipitation, and western blot. This study testified that silencing long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 could inhibit proliferation and invasion of CRC cells by miR-542-3p/integrin-linked kinase.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks the third in cancer and the second in the reason of cancer-related death worldwide. Increasing evidence indicates that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) participates in tumor initiation and progression [1, 2]. LncRNA is a special non-coding RNA molecule of more than 200 nucleotides in length and has been known as a potential novel prognostic biomarker in CRC [2]. It’s known that as an oncogenic lncRNA [3]. Cancer susceptibility candidate 9 (CASC9) is usually high in CRC and associated with advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and poor prognosis. A study identified the CASC9/miR-576-5p/AKT3 axis is relevant to the proliferation and apoptosis of CRC [4]. Knockdown of CASC9 inhibits the proliferation and migration through AKT/mTOR/EMT signaling [5] and promotes apoptosis in CRC cells [3]. In summary, lncRNA CASC9 which plays the role of an oncogene is abnormally highly expressed in CRC.

MiR-542-3p has been reported to play a role in tumor suppressor genes and is low expressed in CRC [68].

According to the report, integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is a target gene of miR-542-3p in osteosarcoma, and upregulating miR-542-3p will downregulate ILK [9]. In CRC, overexpression of ILK is associated with genomic instability, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and cancer stem cells (CSCs) traits, which contribute to tumor progression, migration, invasion, and chemoresistance via NF-κB, CTEN signals, etc. [1015]. High immunohistochemical expression of ILK is associated with poor prognostic and pathological parameters [15, 16].

Based on the above, we hypothesized that up-regulating lncRNA CASC9 down-regulate miR-542-3p, overexpress ILK and participate in CRC as a result. In this review, silencing lncRNA CASC9 could inhibit CRC by regulating miR-542-3p/ILK.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study was designed to characterize the inhibiting effect of silencing lncRNA CASC9 on CRC by miR-542-3p/ILK. Based on the literature, we first hypothesized that up-regulating lncRNA CASC9 could down-regulate miR-542-3p, overexpress ILK, at last participate in CRC. In this study, human normal intestinal epithelial cells and two human CRC cells were used in vitro assays. 36 samples were independently derived from at least 36 unrelated patients. We first detected the expression of lncRNA CASC9, then evaluated the effect of lncRNA CASC9 on CRC, and explored how miR-542-3p/ILK affected lncRNA CASC9. To translate the findings in vitro into in vivo, we designed an animal experiment. All studies were performed in technical duplicates or triplicates as indicated. Results shown were either representative of or mean of at least three independent experiments (otherwise annotated in the legends).

CRC samples analysis

With patients’ written informed consent, thirty-six paired fresh primary colorectal cancer and matched adjacent normal tissues were collected by surgical from adult CRC patients and were immediately frozen in a −80°C freezer. Samples were obtained from September 2020 to March 2021 and detected in April 2021. Authors had no access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection. This study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team (Ethics approval number 2020–023).

Cell culture

Human normal intestinal epithelial cells NCM460, and CRC cell lines HCT116 and SW620 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). HCT116, SW620, and NCM460 cells were maintained in DMEM or RPMI (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). The mediums were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin mixture. The cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. All cell lines were free of mycoplasma and were authenticated by genetic profiling using polymorphic short tandem repeat loci.

Stable CASC9-knockdown cell lines

Lentiviral particles were produced in HEK293T cells and co-transfected with sh-CASC9–1, sh-CASC9–2, sh-CASC9–3, or corresponding empty vectors. Next, HCT116 and SW620 were infected with lentiviral particles in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene (Genechem, Shanghai, China) and selected using 0.5 μg/ml puromycin. Puromycin-resistant cell pools were collected and verified by qPCR one week later.

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent and was treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 30 minutes. cDNA was synthesized using the M-MLV reverse transcription kit (Promega) as manufacturer’s instructions. ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) on a Quant Studio 3 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to conduct qPCR. GAPDH and U6 were used as the internal reference of lncRNA CASC9 and miR-542-3p, respectively. The expression of targeted genes was calculated using 2-ΔΔCt.

CCK-8 assay for cell proliferation

Firstly, 2 × 103 cells/well were seeded into a 96-well plate. After attachment, cells were transfected with siRNA and incubated in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, the medium containing 10% CCK-8 (Meilun Biotechnology, Dalian, China) was placed into per well. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes [4]. Then, the absorbance was detected at a wavelength of 450 nm with a microplate reader (Tecan, Lyon, France).

EdU assay for cell proliferation

A BeyoClick™ EdU-488 Cell Proliferation Kit (Beyotime, C0071S) was used to measure cell proliferation as manufacturer’s instructions. 4 × 104 HCT116 and SW620 cells/well were seeded into plates and cultured for 24 hours, then were nurtured with 10 μM EdU for 2 hours, followed by fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime, P0099) for 15 minutes and treatment of 0.3% Triton X-100 (Beyotime) for 10 minutes. Afterward, cells were incubated with the click reaction solution for 30 minutes. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 for 10 minutes [17]. Cells were observed with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The ratio of Edu-positive cells (Edu-positive cells/Hoechst 33342-stained cells) was calculated to analyze the proliferative ability.

Transwell assay for cell invasion and migration

24-well transwell coated with Matrigel (8-μm pore size; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) were used for invasion and migration experiments. 1×105 non-transfected cells or stably transfected cells were plated on separate wells and were cultured overnight in serum-free medium before trypsinization and re-suspended at a density of 2×105 cells/ml in DMEM including 1% FBS. The cells were loaded to the upper chamber, with DMEM including 10% FBS as a chemoattractant in the lower chamber. The DMEM including 1% FBS in the lower chamber was used as a control. The Matrigel and the cells remaining in the upper chamber were 24 hours incubation. The cells in the lower surface of the membrane were stained with hematoxylin after being fixed with formaldehyde solution. The cells in at least five random microscopic fields (×200) were counted and photographed [8].

Luciferase reporter gene assay for genes’ targeted interaction

To generate luciferase reporter constructs, the dual‐luciferase miRNA target expression vector pmirGLO (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) was used. Full length of lncRNA CASC9 or ILK 3′-UTR sequence with wild-type (WT) and mutant type (Mut) miRNA binding sites were obtained from Vigene Biosciences (Rockville, Maryland). Cells were seeded into 96-well plates and co-transfected with wild-type or mutant lncRNA CASC9 or ILK 3′-UTR constructs and miR-542-3p mimic using Lipofectamine 3000. After 48 hours, luciferase activity was measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and assessed.

In vivo assay and xenograft tumor analysis

6-week-old male BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center (Shanghai, China) and housed under pathogen-free conditions. Logarithmically growing cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS. 1 × 107 SW620 or CASC9-knockdown SW620 cells were subcutaneously injected into the rear flanks of a mouse. Xenograft tumors were measured by a Vernier caliper, and tumor volume was calculated using the following equation: V = L × W2 × 0.5236 (L = long axis, W = short axis) every week until the fourth week.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin sections (5 μm) from xenograft tumor samples were deparaffinized in 100% xylene and rehydrated with a decreasing ethanol series and then water. Antigen retrieval was conducted in 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 100°C for 10 minutes. IHC assay was performed as described previously using supersensitive horseradish peroxidase immunohistochemistry kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) [3] per manufacturer’s instructions with anti-Ki67 antibody (sc-23900, Santa Cruz) and anti-MMP2 antibody (sc-13595, Santa Cruz).

RNA immunoprecipitation assay

A Magna RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) Kit (Geneseed, Guangzhou, China) was used as the manufacturer’s instructions. Antibodies for RIP assay of Ago2 and control IgG were from Abcam. The co-precipitated RNAs were detected by qPCR. The total RNAs were the input controls.

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer, and total protein was quantified using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime). Total denatured protein (30 μg) was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). The blots were incubated with primary antibodies ILK (ab76468, 1:5000 dilution, Abcam, USA) and β-actin (ab8227,1:5000 dilution, Abcam, USA) at 4°C overnight. The next morning, after incubated at room temperature for 1 hour, the blots were washed 30 minutes with TBST, then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 hour. After being washed with TBST and PBS, immunocomplexes were detected with Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). and were analyzed in GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test, Mann Whitney U-test, or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences between groups were determined using two-way ANOVA. The significance of the clinicopathologic parameters of CRC patients was determined by the chi-square test. All P values were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

LncRNA CASC9 expresses highly in CRC

The expression of lncRNA CASC9 in CRC specimens and two cell lines of CRC were firstly evaluated. The 36 specimens (carcinomas and para-cancerous tissues) were obtained from CRC patients and detected via qPCR. LncRNA CASC9 of carcinomas significantly expressed more highly than that of para-cancerous tissues in CRC patients (p<0.01) (Fig 1A). We further analyzed whether there was a difference between TNM I&II and TNM III. We found that the expression of lncRNA CASC9 in TNM III was more significant than those in TNM I&II, which declared that the expression of lncRNA CASC9 was positively related to the TNM stage (Fig 1B). In vitro, compared to NCM460, lncRNA CASC9 overexpressed both in SW620 and HCT116 cell lines, which was coincident with the result of human tissues (Fig 1C). Therefore, we conclude that lncRNA CASC9 expresses highly in CRC.

Fig 1. LncRNA CASC9 expresses highly in CRC.

Fig 1

(A)The relative expression of lncRNA CASC9 of carcinomas and para-cancerous tissues from patients with CRC was determined by qPCR. Histogram of relative expression of lncRNA CASC9 (log2T/N) from 36 patients(n = 36), one histogram represents one specimen. Most of these values are positive(p<0.01). (B) Subsets were defined as TNM I&II and TNM III from 36 carcinomas, relative expression of lncRNA CASC9 in two subsets were compared, and the expression in TNM III was significantly higher than that in TNM I&II. Each dot represents one carcinoma (n = 36). (C) Relative expression of lncRNA CASC9 in NCM460, SW620, and HCT116 are determined. Compared to NCM460, lncRNA CASC9 overexpressed both in SW620 and HCT116 cell lines. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Downregulating lncRNA CASC9 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells

To characterize the function of lncRNA CASC9, we turned to the vitro system. We firstly constructed three lentiviral vectors with lncRNA CASC9 knocked down, packaged lentivirus and infected CRC cells. Three stable transformants of CRC cell lines were obtained with down-regulation of lncRNA CASC9, which were identified by qPCR. The expression of lncRNA CASC9 on both SW620 and HCT116 cell lines confirmed the same pattern as observed. Compared to the control subset, 3 experimental subsets all could reduce the expression of lncRNA CASC9, especially in sh-CASC9-2 subset (Fig 2A). Thus, in the following assay, we used sh-CASC9-2 to downregulate lncRNA CASC9. The proliferation of both SW620 and HCT116 with sh-NC and sh-CASC9-2 were tested by CCK8 and showed that knocking down lncRNA CASC9 could significantly inhibit the proliferation of CRC (Fig 2B and 2C). Next, EdU was used as double labeling to detect the newly synthesized DNA of SW620 and HCT116 cells for detecting the cell proliferation rate. The results indicated that knocking down lncRNA CASC9 significantly inhibited proliferation (Fig 2D). Transwell experiments showed that knocking down lncRNA CASC9 significantly inhibited the invasion and migration of SW620 and HCT116 (Fig 2E and 2F). In summary, downregulation of lncRNA CASC9 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of CRC.

Fig 2. Downregulating lncRNA CASC9 inhibits proliferation and invasion of CRC cells.

Fig 2

Relative expression of lncRNA CASC9 in SW620 and HCT116 cell lines of CRC were determined by qPCR, Black represents SW620 and grey represents HCT116 in histograms. (A)Subsets were defined as sh-NC, sh-CASC9-1, sh-CASC9-2, and sh-CASC9-3. sh-CASC9-2 downregulated the expression of lncRNA CASC9 most significantly. (B&C) Then, we respectively detected the proliferation of SW620 and HCT116 on sh-NC and sh-CASC9-2 subsets at 0, 24, 48, and 72h via CCK8, the proliferation of both SW620 and HCT116 with sh-CASC9-2 were significantly slower than the sh-NC subset, and the inhibitory effect was in a time-dependent manner. Blue represents the sh-NC subset, and red represents the sh-CASC9-2 subset. (D) EdU assay indicated that knocking down lncRNA CASC9 significantly inhibited the proliferation of CRC. Histograms of Edu positive cells on sh-NC and sh-CASC9-2 subsets are quantized results of left pictures. (E&F) Transwell was tested for invasion and migration of SW620 and HCT116 cell lines on sh-NC and sh-CASC9-2 subsets. Sh-CASC9-2 subsets showed significant inhibition of invasion and migration. The upper picture is about migration, and the below one is about invasion. The histograms are the quantitative analysis of the left pictures. Scale bar = 50 μm. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Downregulating lncRNA CASC9 in SW620 xenograft tumor inhibits SW620 proliferation

To explore the functional consequences of downregulating lncRNA CASC9 in SW620 xenograft tumor, SW620 cells with stable down-regulation of lncRNA CASC9 were inoculated into nude mice to establish xenograft tumor models. Growth curves of xenograft tumors were drawn and weights of xenograft tumors were measured. After analyzing, we knew that downregulation of lncRNA CASC9 could significantly inhibit xenograft tumor growth (Fig 3A). Weights of transplanted tumors in the experimental group were much lighter than those of the control group (Fig 3B). Ki67 and MMP2 were detected through IHC, and Ki67 reduced significantly in positive cells (Fig 3C), while the decrease of MMP2 in positive cells was not so obvious as Ki67 (Fig 3D). The expression levels of lncRNA CASC9, miR-542-3p, and ILK on xenograft CRC were tested via qPCR. The results showed that lncRNA CASC9 and ILK were downregulated and miR-542-3p was upregulated (Fig 3E–3G), which suggests that there may be a correlation among lncRNA CASC9, miR-542-3p and ILK. The in vivo experiment indicated that downregulating lncRNA CASC9 could inhibit CRC from proliferating and may reduce its invasion.

Fig 3. Downregulating lncRNA CASC9 in SW620 xenograft tumor inhibits SW620 proliferation.

Fig 3

SW620 with stable down-regulation of lncRNA CASC9 were inoculated into nude mice to establish xenograft tumor models. Two groups were designed, sh-NC was the normal group, (i.e., control group), and the other one was an experimental group with which stable down-regulation of lncRNA CASC9 xenograft tumor. Black represents sh-NC and grey represents sh-CASC9-2 in histograms. (A)Growth curves of xenograft tumors were drawn respectively in 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks, and tumor volume was inhibited in the sh-CASC9-2 subset. The blue represents sh-NC and red represents sh-CASC9-2 in the line chart. (B)Tumor weights were detected at last, and the tumor in the sh-CASC9-2 subset was lighter than sh-NC. Ki67 and MMP2 were detected by IHC. (C) Ki67 in positive cells significantly reduced in the sh-CASC9-2 subset, (D) while the decrease of MMP2 in positive cells was not so obvious. The histograms are the quantitative analysis of pictures. (E&F&G) Compared to the NC subset, the expression of lncRNA CASC9 and ILK in the sh-CASC9-2 subset was significantly downregulated, while the expression of miR-542-3p in the sh-CASC9-2 subset was significantly upregulated. Scale bar = 50 μm. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

LncRNA CASC9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p by molecular sponge adsorption

Firstly, we predicted the binding sites for miR-542-3p in lncRNA CASC9 via bioinformatics analysis (Fig 4A). Then, dual-luciferase reporter gene assay with lncRNA CASC9 plasmid vector including Wt and Mut were designed. The results showed that the luciferase activity of the Wt vector in the lncRNA CASC9-Wt+miR-542-3p mimics subset was significantly reduced compared with the lncRNA CASC9-Wt+NC subset but had no effect on that of Mut vector (Fig 4B). In the RIP assay, the fold enrichment in the Ago2 subset was significantly higher than the IgG subset, which further confirmed lncRNA CASC9 could combine miR-542-3p both in SW620 and HCT116 (Fig 4C and 4D). Besides, miR-542-3p in SW620 and HCT116 with down-regulated lncRNA CASC9 were observed the same pattern. MiR-542-3p was significantly up-regulated in the downregulation of lncRNA CASC9 cells. Thus, lncRNA CASC9 negatively regulated miR-542-3p (Fig 4E). At last, we summarize that lncRNA CASC9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p in a targeted manner in CRC.

Fig 4. LncRNA CASC9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p by molecular sponge adsorption.

Fig 4

(A) the binding sites for miR-542-3p in lncRNA CASC9 were prompted by bioinformatics analysis. (B) Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay showed that that the luciferase activity of the Wt reporter in the lncRNA CASC9-Wt+miR-542-3p mimics subset was significantly decreased compared to 3 other subsets. Black represents pmirGLO-CASC9-Wt and grey represents pmirGLO-CASC9-Mut in histograms. (C&D) In RNA-IP assay, the fold enrichment in the Ago2 subset was significantly higher than the IgG subset, which further confirmed lncRNA CASC9 could combine miR-542-3p by predicted binding sites both in SW620 and HCT116. Mouse IgG and human Ago2 were used in lncRNA CASC9 and miR-542-3p subsets of CRC cell lines. (E)The relative expression of miR-542-3p of both NC and sh-CASC9-2 in SW620 and HCT116 were detected via qPCR, and downregulating lncRNA CASC9 upregulated miR-542-3p. Black represents SW620 and grey represents HCT116 in histograms. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Up-regulating miR-542-3p inhibits the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells

To study the effect of up-regulated miR-542-3p on CRC, we transfected miR-542-3p mimic into SW620 and HCT116 cells and identified the expression of miR-542-3p by qPCR. MiR-542-3p mimic did upregulate miR-542-3p significantly (Fig 5A). Next, the effect of up-regulated miR-542-3p on proliferation was detected using CCK8. The results showed SW620 with up-regulated miR-542-3p proliferated significantly slower than the miR-NC subset after 72 hours, which appeared earlier in HCT116. (Fig 5B and 5C). In the EdU assay, miR-542-3p mimics significantly inhibited CRC cells, which meant that up-regulating miR-542-3p significantly inhibits CRC from proliferating (Fig 5D). Transwell experiments showed that both invasion and migration of SW620 and HCT116 cells were inhibited by miR-542-3p mimics, which indicated up-regulating miR-542-3p significantly inhibited the invasion and migration of CRC (Fig 5E and 5F). In addition, the effect of upregulating miR-542-3p is consistent with downregulating lncRNA CASC9 in CRC cells.

Fig 5. Up-regulating miR-542-3p inhibits the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells.

Fig 5

Relative expression of miR-542-3p mimics in SW620 and HCT116 cell lines of CRC were determined by qPCR, Black represents SW620 and grey represents HCT116 in histograms. (A) Subsets were defined as miR-NC and miR-542-3p mimics. MiR-542-3p mimics did upregulate the expression of miR-542-3p significantly. (B&C) On the initial results, we respectively detected the proliferation of SW620 and HCT116 on miR-NC and miR-542-3p mimics subsets at 0, 24, 48, and 72h via CCK8, and found that SW620 with miR-542-3p mimics proliferated significantly slower than miR-NC subset after 72 hours, while HCT116 with miR-542-3p mimics proliferated significantly slower than miR-NC subset after 48 hours. Blue represents the miR-NC subset, and red represents miR-542-3p mimics. (D) Edu assay showed miR-542-3p mimics significantly inhibited CRC from proliferating. Histograms of Edu positive cells in miR-NC and miR-542-3p mimics subsets are the quantitative analysis of pictures. (E&F) Transwell was used for the invasion and migration of SW620 and HCT116 cell lines. Both invasion and migration were inhibited in miR-542-3p mimics subsets. The upper picture is about migration, and the below one is about invasion. The histograms are the quantitative analysis of the left pictures. Scale bar = 50 μm. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

ILK is the target gene of miR-542-3p

We analyzed the bioinformatics and predicted the binding sites for miR-542-3p in ILK 3 ’UTR (Fig 6A). Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay with ILK plasmid vector including Wt and Mut 3’ UTR were designed. The results showed that the luciferase activity of the Wt reporter in the ILK-Wt+miR-542-3p mimics subset was significantly reduced compared with the ILK-Wt+NC subset while not affecting that of the Mut vector (Fig 6B). In protein level, ILK was down-regulated in miR-542-3p mimics in SW620 and HCT116. Besides, compared to the control groups, the difference was significant. Thus, miR-542-3p negatively regulated ILK (Fig 6C). Accordingly, ILK is the target gene of miR-542-3p, and miR-542-3p negatively regulates ILK.

Fig 6. ILK is the target gene of miR-542-3p.

Fig 6

(A) We first found the binding sites for miR-542-3p in ILK 3 ’UTR via bioinformatics analysis, (B) then ILK 3 ’UTR -Wt and ILK 3 ’UTR -Mut were designed, and the results of dual luciferase report assay revealed that the luciferase activity of the Wt reporter in the ILK-Wt+miR-542-3p mimics subset was significantly reduced compared to 3 other subsets. (C) The effect of transfected miR-542-3p mimic on the expression of the ILK protein was detected by WB. ILK protein was downregulated in miR-542-3p mimics subsets both in SW620 and HCT116. Three subsets were designed and compared to blank or miR-NC, ILK in up-regulated miR-542-3p expressed lower. Black represents pmirGLO-ILK 3 ’UTR -Wt and grey represent pmirGLO-ILK 3 ’UTR -Mut in histograms. The right picture is the quantitative analysis of the left one. Black represents SW620 and grey represents HCT116 in histograms. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Overexpression of ILK significantly restores the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 or upregulated miR-542-3p

Finally, we wanted to know miR-542-3p/ILK axis is indispensable for downregulating lncRNA CASC9 in CRC cells. The response of down-regulation of lncRNA CASC9 or up-regulation of miR-542-3p to overexpression of ILK were detected via transwells and Edu assays. We confirmed that both down-regulating lncRNA CASC9 or up-regulating miR-542-3p could inhibit the invasion, while overexpression of ILK could significantly restore part of the invasion inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 or upregulated miR-542-3p, which existed not only in SW620 but also in HCT116 (Fig 7A). EdU assay verified that overexpression of ILK significantly improved the proliferation which was inhibited by down-regulated lncRNA CASC9 or up-regulated miR-542-3p (Fig 7B). Thus, overexpression of ILK can significantly weaken the inhibition on proliferation and invasion which is inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 and upregulated miR-542-3p in CRC.

Fig 7. Overexpression of ILK significantly restores the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells with downregulated lncRNA CASC9 or upregulated miR-542-3p.

Fig 7

5 groups were designed, they are blank, sh-CASC9-2, sh-CASC9-2+pcDNA2.1-ILK, miR-542-3p mimics, and miR-542-3p mimics+pcDNA3. Black represents SW620 and grey represents HCT116 in histograms. (A) Transwell was used for invasion on 5 subsets of SW620 and HCT116 cell lines. Both down-regulating lncRNA CASC9 and up-regulating miR-542-3p could inhibit the invasion, while overexpression of ILK could significantly restore part of proliferation which is inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 and upregulated miR-542-3p, not only in SW620 but also in HCT116. (B) Edu assay was determined by comparing the proliferation among 5 groups. Compared to down-regulating lncRNA CASC9 and up-regulating miR-542-3p, overexpression of ILK significantly improved the proliferation inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 and upregulated miR-542-3p. Histograms are the quantitative analysis of pictures. Scale bar = 50 μm. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Discussion

CASC9 is mainly concentrated in the cytoplasm and significantly upregulated in human tumor tissues including CRC. ILK, located in the nucleus and centrosomes, is abnormally overexpressed in CRC tissues. We compared the survivals of CASC9 and ILK using the GEPIA database (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) and found that both CASC9 and ILK had the similar tendency that the survival time of the low gene expression group was longer than that of the high gene expression group over time, while the tendency in miR-542-3p was not obvious. It suggests that there may be some correlation between CASC9 and ILK. Some studies found that as a competing endogenous RNA, CASC9 inhibits miRNA expression by competitively binding to its target miRNA at the 3′UTR region via a sponging effect and then regulates the progression of various human neoplasms [4, 18]. The expression of miR-542-3p in CRC tissues was verified abnormally downregulated [6, 19, 20], which was verified in our study as well. Some researchers have demonstrated miR-542-3p overexpression down-regulating ILK then inhibiting osteosarcoma has been verified [9]. Thus, there may be a potential mechanism that CASC9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p and miR-542-3p negatively regulate ILK in CRC, which was testified in our research.

A meta-analysis had evaluated the impact of CASC9 on the prognosis and clinicopathological features of patients with cancer, found that a higher CASC9 signified a severe invasion, and high CASC9 meant lower overall survival rate [21]. In nasopharyngeal cancer, CASC9 promotes cell proliferation by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, CASC9 downregulates programmed cell death 4 protein. CASC9 contributes to cellular proliferation by upregulating the glucose transporter 1 gene in laryngeal carcinoma. CASC9 also regulates cell cycle progression in the G1 phase via cyclin D1 in lung adenocarcinoma. In glioma cancer cells, CASC9 magnifies its oncogenic potential via exerting the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 transcription factor by miR-519d. CASC9 positively regulates checkpoint kinase1 by miR-195/147 cluster in breast cancer cells. CASC9/miR-758-3p/LIN7A pathway was identified in ovarian cancer progression. CASC9 expresses highly by miR-125b/neuregulin-1 in hemangioma, colon, lung, and gastric cancers, etc. [21].

In CRC, CASC9 is significantly upregulated, and higher CASC9 is associated with tumor progression and poor outcomes by polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 3 and TGFβ2 mRNA [4, 18]. Silencing CASC9 leads the reduced CRC cell to proliferate and migrate through AKT/mTOR/EMT signaling [5]. Knock-downing CASC9 inhibits proliferation via miR-576-5p/AKT3 and promotes apoptosis [4].

In our study, we also confirmed that CASC9 expresses unusually highly in clinical specimens and CRC cells. Down-regulating CASC9 could inhibit CRC cells from proliferating and invading. LncRNA CASC9 negatively regulates miR-542-3p in a targeted manner, and up-regulating miR-542-3p inhibits CRC cells from proliferating and invading. However, ILK is a driver mutation in CRC. Thus, the effect of CASC9 plus miR-542-3p is the same as ILK in CRC.

MiR‑542‑3p inhibits invasion and migration of esophageal cancer by repressing OTUB1 [22], suppresses the proliferation of osteosarcoma via targeting Smad2 [23], inhibits progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma by impeding ILK/TGF-β1/Smad2/3 [24].

In CRC, miR-542-3p can impede tumor promotion via TUG1 [25], and inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion through OTUB1 [8], cortactin [19], or PI3K/AKT signaling [20].

There are some limitations in this study. First, we verified the inhibition of downregulating lncRNA CASC9 and upregulating miR-542-3p only at the gene level, neglecting the protein level, otherwise, the results will be more convincing. Second, treating silencing lncRNA CASC9 as a method for curing CRC has not yet been seen in a clinical study. It can be known from basic experiments that overexpression of ILK on down-regulated lncRNA CASC9 or up-regulated miR-542-3p is expected to become therapy in the future. Finally, we don’t know whether there are other mechanisms to impact this pathway, which still need to be studied in the future.

Conclusions

In our study, we demonstrated that lncRNA CASC9 expresses highly in CRC, and downregulating it could inhibit cellular proliferation and invasion. Once upregulated, miR-542-3p played an inhibitory role. LncRNA CASC9 did negatively regulate miR-542-3p in a targeted manner, and ILK was the target gene of miR-542-3p. The overexpression of ILK could significantly restore the proliferation inhibited by downregulated lncRNA CASC9 or upregulated miR-542-3p. Thus, we predict that lncRNA CASC9/miR-542-3p/ILK may become a feasible mechanism for curing CRC in the future.

Supporting information

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

S1 File. Original data.

(PDF)

S2 File. Images of correlation between CASC9 and ILK from databases.

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Yang Y, Yan X, Li X, Ma Y, Goel A. Long non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer: Novel oncogenic mechanisms and promising clinical applications. Cancer letters. 2021;504:67–80. Epub 2021/02/13. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.He J, Wu F, Han Z, Hu M, Lin W, Li Y, et al. Biomarkers (mRNAs and Non-Coding RNAs) for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer–From the Body Fluid to Tissue Level. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luo K, Geng J, Zhang Q, Xu Y, Zhou X, Huang Z, et al. LncRNA CASC9 interacts with CPSF3 to regulate TGF-β signaling in colorectal cancer. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR. 2019;38(1):249. Epub 2019/06/13. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1263-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu H-Z, Shan T-D, Han Y, Liu X-S. Silencing long non-coding RNA CASC9 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation by acting as a competing endogenous RNA of miR-576-5p to regulate AKT3. Cell Death Discovery. 2020;6(1). doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-00352-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Islam Khan MZ, Law HKW. Cancer Susceptibility Candidate 9 (CASC9) Promotes Colorectal Cancer Carcinogenesis via mTOR-Dependent Autophagy and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Pathways. Frontiers in molecular biosciences 2021; 8:627022. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.627022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cai J, Zhao J, Zhang N, Xu X, Li R, Yi Y, et al. MicroRNA-542-3p Suppresses Tumor Cell Invasion via Targeting AKT Pathway in Human Astrocytoma. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2015;290(41):24678–88. Epub 2015/08/20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.649004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen BB, Chen XB, Bie LY, Mu Y, Wang HL, Lv HF, et al. Decreased expression of miR-542-3p exerts growth inhibitory functions in esophageal cancer. Journal of cancer research and therapeutics. 2015;11 Suppl 1:C24–8. Epub 2015/09/02. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.163834 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yuan L, Yuan P, Yuan H, Wang Z, Run Z, Chen G, et al. miR-542-3p inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting OTUB1. American journal of cancer research. 2017;7(1):159–72. Epub 2017/01/27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai W, Xu Y, Zuo W, Su Z. MicroR-542-3p can mediate ILK and further inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion in osteosarcoma cells. Aging. 2019;11(1):18–32. Epub 2019/01/13. doi: 10.18632/aging.101698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsoumas D NS, Giannopoulou E, Champeris Tsaniras S, Sirinian C, Maroulis I, Taraviras S, et al. ILK Expression in Colorectal Cancer Is Associated with EMT, Cancer Stem Cell Markers and Chemoresistance. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics. 2018;15(2). doi: 10.21873/cgp.20071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chadla P, Arbi M, Nikou S, Kalliakoudas T, Papadaki H, Taraviras S, et al. Integrin-Linked-Kinase Overexpression Is Implicated in Mechanisms of Genomic Instability in Human Colorectal Cancer. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2021;66(5):1510–23. Epub 2020/06/05. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06364-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yan Z, Yin H, Wang R, Wu D, Sun W, Liu B, et al. Overexpression of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) promotes migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition via NF-κB signaling. Acta histochemica. 2014;116(3):527–33. Epub 2013/12/24. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Albasri A, Al-Ghamdi S, Fadhil W, Aleskandarany M, Liao YC, Jackson D, et al. Cten signals through integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and may promote metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30(26):2997–3002. Epub 2011/02/23. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiao L, Yue X, Ming X, Xu L, Ding M, Xu J, et al. The integrin-linked kinase gene up-regulated by hypoxia plays its pro-survival role in colorectal cancer cells. Journal of receptor and signal transduction research. 2014;34(1):64–72. Epub 2013/12/05. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2013.862271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li R, Liu B, Yin H, Sun W, Yin J, Su Q. Overexpression of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is associated with tumor progression and an unfavorable prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Journal of molecular histology. 2013;44(2):183–9. Epub 2012/10/31. doi: 10.1007/s10735-012-9463-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abuderman A, Harb O, Gertallah L. Prognostic and clinic-pathological significances of HOXB8, ILK and FAT4 expression in colorectal cancer. Współczesna Onkologia. 2020;24(3):183–92. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.100281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang W, Wang Z, Cai G, Huang P. Circ_DOCK1 regulates USP11 through miR-132-3p to control colorectal cancer progression. World journal of surgical oncology. 2021;19(1):67. Epub 2021/03/10. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02173-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sharma U, Barwal TS, Acharya V, Tamang S, Vasquez KM, Jain A. Cancer Susceptibility Candidate 9 (CASC9): A Novel Targetable Long Noncoding RNA in Cancer Treatment. Translational oncology 2020; 13(8):100774. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Long HC, Gao X, Lei CJ, Zhu B, Li L, Zeng C, et al. miR-542-3p inhibits the growth and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through targeted regulation of cortactin. International journal of molecular medicine 2016; 37(4):1112–1118. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang C, Wang MH, Zhou JD, Chi Q. Upregulation of miR-542-3p inhibits the growth and invasion of human colon cancer cells through PI3K/AKT/survivin signaling. Oncology reports 2017; 38(6):3545–3553. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.6054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Duan HY, Ding X, Luo HS. Clinicopathological association and prognostic value of long non-coding RNA CASC9 in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis. Experimental and therapeutic medicine 2020; 20(4):3823–3831. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun J, Deng Y, Shi J, Yang W. MicroRNA‑542‑3p represses OTUB1 expression to inhibit migration and invasion of esophageal cancer cells. Molecular medicine reports 2020; 21(1):35–42. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu Y, You J, Li F, Wang F, Wang Y. MicroRNA-542-3p suppresses tumor cell proliferation via targeting Smad2 inhuman osteosarcoma. Oncology letters 2018; 15(5):6895–6902. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Qiao B, Cai JH, Lam AK, He BX. MicroRNA-542-3p inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma progression by inhibiting ILK/TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling. Oncotarget 2017; 8(41):70761–70776. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu Q, Zhang W, Luo L, Han K, Liu R, Wei S, et al. Long noncoding RNA TUG1 regulates the progression of colorectal cancer through miR-542-3p/TRIB2 axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Diagnostic pathology 2021; 16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13000-021-01101-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Bing-Hua Jiang

22 Oct 2021

PONE-D-21-27936Silencing LncRNA CASC9 Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells by MiR-542-3p/ILKPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

  • Please revise the manuscript in response to all concerns of Reviewer 1; 

  • The manuscript is poorly written.   Please have the whole manuscript edited well;

  • Please analyze the correlation of expression levels of LncCASC9, miR-542 and/or ILK in human tumor tissues using data base;

  • Please analyze expression levels of LncCASC9, miR-542 and ILK in mouse tumor tissues;

  • miR-542 has many targets as ILK.  Please identify another target and show with ILK.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 06 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bing-Hua Jiang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the Methods section, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors showed that silencing long noncoding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 with miR-542-3p/integrin-linked kinase could inhibit proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. The experiments were well conducted, applying different methods to support the effect of silencing lncRNA CASC9 in colorectal cancer.

Suggestions:

1. Please check the English proficiency of the manuscript. There are some grammatical mistakes. For example, “We firstly detected the expression of lncRNA CASC9, then evaluated the effect of lncRNA CASC9 on CRC, and how miR-542-3p/ILK to affect lncRNA CASC9.” in the study design would be better changed to “and explored how miR-542-3p/ILK affects lncRNA CASC9.”

2. There should be a space between the number and the unit. For example, it should be “8 μg/ml”, “0.5 μg/ml”, “1 h” and “30 μg” but not “8μg/ml”, “0.5μg/ml”, “1h” and “30μg”.

3. It is recommended that the method and the test are stated in full in the subtitle, e.g. "EdU assay for cell proliferation".

4. The reference should be provided for “IHC assay was performed as described previously using supersensitive horseradish peroxidase immunohistochemistry kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) per manufacturer’s instructions……” in “Immunohistochemistry”.

5. For the p value, please unify the case of “p” in the statistical analysis and result.

6. For Fig.4b and Fig.6b, “Dual luciferase report assay revealed that compared to 3 control subsets, the activity in Mut significantly reduced” did not match with the data shown in the figures. Please check them.

7. There should be a scale bar to show the size of the cells for EdU and transwell assay in figures.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0265901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265901.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Dec 2021

We greatly appreciate this opportunity to resubmit a revised version of our manu-script, and hope that our attention to these very constructive comments, are found to be responsive and received favorably by you and your expert reviewers.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Bing-Hua Jiang

10 Mar 2022

Silencing LncRNA CASC9 Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells by MiR-542-3p/ILK

PONE-D-21-27936R1

Dear Dr. Zhang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Bing-Hua Jiang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Bing-Hua Jiang

5 Apr 2022

PONE-D-21-27936R1

Silencing LncRNA CASC9 Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells by MiR-542-3p/ILK

Dear Dr. Zhang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Bing-Hua Jiang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    S1 File. Original data.

    (PDF)

    S2 File. Images of correlation between CASC9 and ILK from databases.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES