Sample | Title | Value | Rank |
GSM4490 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED1Cy5 740600GEO | 0.759327 | 87 |
GSM4491 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED2Cy5 700600GEO | 1.99668 | 99 |
GSM4492 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED3Cy5 620620GEO | 1.28689 | 96 |
GSM4508 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG1Cy5 710520GEO | -2.41116 | 3 |
GSM4515 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG2Cy5 710530GEO | -1.98816 | 2 |
GSM4520 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG3Cy5 800500GEO | -1.64552 | 9 |
GSM4524 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD1Cy5 740600GEO | -1.6471 | 7 |
GSM4530 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD2Cy5 840640GEO | -1.40305 | 9 |
GSM4534 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD3Cy5 800650GEO | -1.25979 | 12 |
GSM4541 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG1Cy5 640620GEO | -1.45498 | 4 |
GSM4547 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG2Cy5 630620GEO | -1.24437 | 5 |
GSM4552 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG3Cy5 710540GEO | -1.47274 | 7 |
GSM4559 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS1Cy5 610620GEO | -1.90198 | 4 |
GSM4564 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS2Cy5 700600GEO | -1.96386 | 5 |
GSM4568 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS3Cy5 730600GEO | -1.37003 | 14 |