Sample | Title | Value | Rank |
GSM388904 | Patient 1 Omental Lean | 2.70162 | 71 |
GSM388917 | Patient 3 Subcutaneous Lean | 4.83703 | 79 |
GSM388918 | Patient 4 Subcutaneous Lean | 3.12278 | 73 |
GSM388905 | Patient 5 Omental Lean | 2.5554 | 70 |
GSM388919 | Patient 5 Subcutaneous Lean | 4.78609 | 79 |
GSM388930 | Patient 6 Omental Lean | 3.98702 | 78 |
GSM388931 | Patient 6 Subcutaneous Lean | 7.22275 | 84 |
GSM388906 | Patient 10 Omental Obese | 6.68434 | 85 |
GSM388920 | Patient 10 Subcutaneous Obese | 13.4277 | 89 |
GSM388907 | Patient 14 Omental Obese | 8.6304 | 92 |
GSM388921 | Patient 14 Subcutaneous Obese | 9.00631 | 85 |
GSM388908 | Patient 15 Omental Obese | 4.95971 | 81 |
GSM388922 | Patient 15 Subcutaneous Obese | 4.39488 | 79 |
GSM388909 | Patient 17 Omental Obese | 3.69412 | 78 |
GSM388923 | Patient 17 Subcutaneous Obese | 4.4336 | 79 |
GSM388910 | Patient 18 Omental Obese | 2.4997 | 70 |
GSM388924 | Patient 18 Subcutaneous Obese | 4.70887 | 81 |
GSM388911 | Patient 19 Omental Obese | 7.46848 | 84 |
GSM388925 | Patient 19 Subcutaneous Obese | 3.58544 | 77 |
GSM388912 | Patient 20 Omental Obese | 6.07282 | 81 |
GSM388926 | Patient 20 Subcutaneous Obese | 10.2012 | 95 |
GSM388913 | Patient 21 Omental Obese | 10.9527 | 90 |
GSM388927 | Patient 21 Subcutaneous Obese | 3.97838 | 76 |
GSM388914 | Patient 22 Omental Obese | 5.62949 | 81 |
GSM388928 | Patient 22 Subcutaneous Obese | 7.49845 | 90 |
GSM388915 | Patient 23 Omental Obese | 2.9397 | 72 |
GSM388929 | Patient 23 Subcutaneous Obese | 3.42569 | 74 |
GSM388916 | Patient 24 Omental Obese | 3.46691 | 75 |