U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001360.3(DHCR7):c.964-1G>T AND Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome

Germline classification:
Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic (8 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Dec 11, 2023
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000383519.21

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001360.3(DHCR7):c.964-1G>T]

NM_001360.3(DHCR7):c.964-1G>T

Gene:
DHCR7:7-dehydrocholesterol reductase [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
11q13.4
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001360.3(DHCR7):c.964-1G>T
HGVS:
  • NC_000011.10:g.71435840C>A
  • NG_012655.2:g.17592G>T
  • NM_001163817.2:c.964-1G>T
  • NM_001360.3:c.964-1G>TMANE SELECT
  • LRG_340t1:c.964-1G>T
  • LRG_340:g.17592G>T
  • NC_000011.9:g.71146886C>A
  • NM_001163817.1:c.964-1G>T
  • NM_001360.2:c.964-1G>T
Links:
dbSNP: rs138659167
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs138659167
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001163817.2:c.964-1G>T - splice acceptor variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001574]
  • NM_001360.3:c.964-1G>T - splice acceptor variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001574]

Condition(s)

Name:
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS)
Synonyms:
LETHAL ACRODYSGENITAL SYNDROME; POLYDACTYLY, SEX REVERSAL, RENAL HYPOPLASIA, AND UNILOBAR LUNG; RUTLEDGE LETHAL MULTIPLE CONGENITAL ANOMALY SYNDROME; See all synonyms [MedGen]
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0010035; MedGen: C0175694; Orphanet: 818; OMIM: 270400

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000373913Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
criteria provided, single submitter

(ICSL Variant Classification Criteria 09 May 2019)
Likely pathogenic
(Apr 27, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (3)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV000793446Counsyl
no assertion criteria provided
Pathogenic
(Aug 16, 2017)
unknownclinical testing

PubMed (3)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

SCV000832154Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Pathogenic
(Dec 11, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (8)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

SCV000917276Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Pathogenic
(Nov 29, 2018)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (3)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV001163694Baylor Genetics
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Pathogenicgermlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV001366807Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Pathogenic
(Aug 19, 2019)
unknownclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV002093018Natera, Inc.
no assertion criteria provided
Pathogenic
(May 4, 2017)
germlineclinical testing

SCV002794355Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Pathogenic
(Dec 27, 2021)
unknownclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedunknownyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedunknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Aberrant 5' splice sites in human disease genes: mutation pattern, nucleotide structure and comparison of computational tools that predict their utilization.

Buratti E, Chivers M, Královicová J, Romano M, Baralle M, Krainer AR, Vorechovsky I.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(13):4250-63. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
17576681
PMCID:
PMC1934990

Statistical features of human exons and their flanking regions.

Zhang MQ.

Hum Mol Genet. 1998 May;7(5):919-32.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
9536098
See all PubMed Citations (11)

Details of each submission

From Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, SCV000373913.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (3)

Description

The DHCR7 c.964-1G>T variant occurs in a canonical splice site (acceptor) and is therefore predicted to disrupt or distort the normal gene product. The c.964-1G>T variant, which is also described as IVS8-1G>T, has been reported in two studies in which it is identified in three patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS), including one homozygote and two compound heterozygotes (Jira et al. 2001; Weaver et al. 2008; Lanthaler et al. 2013). This variant was also found in a heterozygous state in the father of one patient, who had abnormally low cholesterol levels. Control data are unavailable for this variant, which is reported at a frequency of 0.00666 in the European (Finnish) population of the Exome Aggregation Consortium database. Jira et al. (2001) noted that the c.964-1G>T variant occurs at the same position as the known pathogenic c.964-1G>C splice acceptor variant, which accounts for over 28% of all disease-causing alleles in SLOS. The c.964-1G>C variant disrupts the splice acceptor site of intron eight, which leads to the insertion of 134 base pairs of intronic sequence into the DHCR7 mRNA causing a frameshift and premature truncation, ultimately resulting in a non-functional protein product. The c.964-1G>T variant is predicted to result in the same non-functional protein. Based on the evidence and due to the potential impact of splice acceptor variants, the c.964-1G>T variant is classified as likely pathogenic for Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Counsyl, SCV000793446.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (3)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp, SCV000832154.6

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (8)

Description

This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 8 of the DHCR7 gene. While this variant is not anticipated to result in nonsense mediated decay, it likely alters RNA splicing and results in a disrupted protein product. This variant is present in population databases (rs138659167, gnomAD 0.05%). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individuals with Smith–Lemli–Opitz Syndrome (PMID: 11427181, 20104611). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 305956). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. This variant disrupts the c.964-1G nucleotide in the DHCR7 gene. Other variant(s) that disrupt this nucleotide have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 10814720, 10995508, 11427181, 23042628). This suggests that this nucleotide is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this position are likely to be disease-causing. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000917276.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (3)

Description

Variant summary: DHCR7 c.964-1G>T is located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Five predict the variant abolishes a 3 acceptor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.6e-05 in 259000 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in DHCR7 causing Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (6.6e-05 vs 0.0043), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.964-1G>T, has been reported in the literature in compound heterozygote and homozygote individuals affected with Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (Jira_2001, Weaver_2010, Lanthaler_2013). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as likely pathogenic/pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Baylor Genetics, SCV001163694.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, SCV001366807.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This variant was classified as: Pathogenic. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PVS1,PS1,PM2.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Natera, Inc., SCV002093018.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics, SCV002794355.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1unknownunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2024