U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_002880.4(RAF1):c.1927C>T (p.Pro643Ser) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (2 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Jun 16, 2022
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000220865.5

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_002880.4(RAF1):c.1927C>T (p.Pro643Ser)]

NM_002880.4(RAF1):c.1927C>T (p.Pro643Ser)

Gene:
RAF1:Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
3p25.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_002880.4(RAF1):c.1927C>T (p.Pro643Ser)
HGVS:
  • NC_000003.12:g.12584534G>A
  • NG_007467.1:g.84646C>T
  • NM_001354689.3:c.1987C>T
  • NM_001354690.3:c.1927C>T
  • NM_001354691.3:c.1684C>T
  • NM_001354692.3:c.1684C>T
  • NM_001354693.3:c.1828C>T
  • NM_001354694.3:c.1744C>T
  • NM_001354695.3:c.1585C>T
  • NM_002880.4:c.1927C>TMANE SELECT
  • NP_001341618.1:p.Pro663Ser
  • NP_001341619.1:p.Pro643Ser
  • NP_001341620.1:p.Pro562Ser
  • NP_001341621.1:p.Pro562Ser
  • NP_001341622.1:p.Pro610Ser
  • NP_001341623.1:p.Pro582Ser
  • NP_001341624.1:p.Pro529Ser
  • NP_002871.1:p.Pro643Ser
  • NP_002871.1:p.Pro643Ser
  • LRG_413t1:c.1927C>T
  • LRG_413t2:c.1987C>T
  • LRG_413:g.84646C>T
  • LRG_413p1:p.Pro643Ser
  • LRG_413p2:p.Pro663Ser
  • NC_000003.11:g.12626033G>A
  • NM_002880.3:c.1927C>T
  • NR_148940.3:n.2371C>T
  • NR_148941.3:n.2317C>T
  • NR_148942.3:n.2256C>T
Protein change:
P529S
Links:
dbSNP: rs876657967
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs876657967
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001354689.3:c.1987C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354690.3:c.1927C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354691.3:c.1684C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354692.3:c.1684C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354693.3:c.1828C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354694.3:c.1744C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001354695.3:c.1585C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_002880.4:c.1927C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NR_148940.3:n.2371C>T - non-coding transcript variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001619]
  • NR_148941.3:n.2317C>T - non-coding transcript variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001619]
  • NR_148942.3:n.2256C>T - non-coding transcript variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001619]
Observations:
1

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000272344Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
criteria provided, single submitter

(LMM Criteria)
Uncertain significance
(Dec 22, 2015)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV002555923Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Jun 16, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlinenot provided11not providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants.

Duzkale H, Shen J, McLaughlin H, Alfares A, Kelly MA, Pugh TJ, Funke BH, Rehm HL, Lebo MS.

Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):453-63. doi: 10.1111/cge.12257.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
24033266
PMCID:
PMC3995020

Details of each submission

From Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, SCV000272344.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not provided1not providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

The p.Pro643Ser variant in RAF1 has not been previously reported in individuals with a RASopathy disorder and was absent from large population studies. Proline (Pro) at position 643 is not conserved in mammals or evolutionarily distant spec ies and 2 species (bactrian camel, ground finch) carry a serine (Ser) at this po sition, raising the possibility that this change may be tolerated. In summary, t he clinical significance of the p.Pro643Ser variant is uncertain.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenot providednot providednot providednot provided1not provided1not provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV002555923.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

Variant summary: RAF1 c.1927C>T (p.Pro643Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251246 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1927C>T in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2022