U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NC_000023.10:g.(31525571_31645789)_(31893491_31947712)del AND Qualitative or quantitative defects of dystrophin

Germline classification:
Pathogenic (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Sep 1, 2022
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV002302508.1

Allele description [Variation Report for NC_000023.10:g.(31525571_31645789)_(31893491_31947712)del]

NC_000023.10:g.(31525571_31645789)_(31893491_31947712)del

Gene:
DMD:dystrophin [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
Deletion
Cytogenetic location:
Xp21.1
Genomic location:
ChrX: 31525571 - 31947712 (on Assembly GRCh37)
Preferred name:
NC_000023.10:g.(31525571_31645789)_(31893491_31947712)del
HGVS:
NC_000023.10:g.(31525571_31645789)_(31893491_31947712)del

Condition(s)

Name:
Qualitative or quantitative defects of dystrophin
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0016147; MedGen: C5679787

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV002598772Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Pathogenic
(Sep 1, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (5)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Genotype-phenotype analysis in 2,405 patients with a dystrophinopathy using the UMD-DMD database: a model of nationwide knowledgebase.

Tuffery-Giraud S, Béroud C, Leturcq F, Yaou RB, Hamroun D, Michel-Calemard L, Moizard MP, Bernard R, Cossée M, Boisseau P, Blayau M, Creveaux I, Guiochon-Mantel A, de Martinville B, Philippe C, Monnier N, Bieth E, Khau Van Kien P, Desmet FO, Humbertclaude V, Kaplan JC, Chelly J, et al.

Hum Mutat. 2009 Jun;30(6):934-45. doi: 10.1002/humu.20976.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
19367636

Assessment of the structural and functional impact of in-frame mutations of the DMD gene, using the tools included in the eDystrophin online database.

Nicolas A, Lucchetti-Miganeh C, Yaou RB, Kaplan JC, Chelly J, Leturcq F, Barloy-Hubler F, Le Rumeur E.

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Jul 9;7:45.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
22776072
PMCID:
PMC3748829
See all PubMed Citations (5)

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV002598772.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (5)

Description

Variant summary: The variant identified by MLPA or other technology involves the deletion of exons 48-55 in the DMD gene. A presumed nomenclature of c.(6912+1_6913-1)_(8217+1_8218-1)del has been designated for the purposes of this classification. Although exact breakpoints of this deletion are not known, it is expected to result in a large in-frame deletion change in the DMD gene, affecting the rod domain, which is comprised of 24 spectrin-like repeats, interspersed with 4 hinge domains (InterPro). The variant was absent in 16110 control chromosomes (gnomAD database, Structural Variants dataset). The variant, c.(6912+1_6913-1)_(8217+1_8218-1)del, has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with Dystrophinopathies (e.g. Tuffery-Giraud_2009, Nicolas_2012, Neri_2020, Tong_2020, Alimohamed_2021). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. At least one clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2023