ClinVar Genomic variation as it relates to human health
NM_016335.6(PRODH):c.1322T>C (p.Leu441Pro)
The aggregate germline classification for this variant, typically for a monogenic or Mendelian disorder as in the ACMG/AMP guidelines, or for response to a drug. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the aggregate classification.
Stars represent the aggregate review status, or the level of review supporting the aggregate germline classification for this VCV record. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the review status. The number of submissions which contribute to this review status is shown in parentheses.
Pathogenic(2); Likely pathogenic(3); Uncertain significance(6)
No data submitted for somatic clinical impact
No data submitted for oncogenicity
Variant Details
- Identifiers
-
NM_016335.6(PRODH):c.1322T>C (p.Leu441Pro)
Variation ID: 4008 Accession: VCV000004008.49
- Type and length
-
single nucleotide variant, 1 bp
- Location
-
Cytogenetic: 22q11.21 22: 18918421 (GRCh38) [ NCBI UCSC ] 22: 18905934 (GRCh37) [ NCBI UCSC ]
- Timeline in ClinVar
-
First in ClinVar Help The date this variant first appeared in ClinVar with each type of classification.
Last submission Help The date of the most recent submission for each type of classification for this variant.
Last evaluated Help The most recent date that a submitter evaluated this variant for each type of classification.
Germline Mar 16, 2015 Oct 20, 2024 Apr 17, 2024 - HGVS
-
Nucleotide Protein Molecular
consequenceNM_016335.6:c.1322T>C MANE Select Help Transcripts from the Matched Annotation from the NCBI and EMBL-EBI (MANE) collaboration.
NP_057419.5:p.Leu441Pro missense NM_001195226.2:c.998T>C NP_001182155.2:p.Leu333Pro missense NM_016335.5:c.1322T>C NC_000022.11:g.18918421A>G NC_000022.10:g.18905934A>G NG_008226.3:g.23133T>C - Protein change
- L441P, L333P
- Other names
- -
- Canonical SPDI
- NC_000022.11:18918420:A:G
-
Functional
consequence HelpThe effect of the variant on RNA or protein function, based on experimental evidence from submitters.
- -
-
Global minor allele
frequency (GMAF) HelpThe global minor allele frequency calculated by the 1000 Genomes Project. The minor allele at this location is indicated in parentheses and may be different from the allele represented by this VCV record.
-
0.00659 (G)
-
Allele frequency
Help
The frequency of the allele represented by this VCV record.
-
The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) 0.00282
1000 Genomes Project 30x 0.00312
The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), exomes 0.00521
Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) 0.00576
1000 Genomes Project 0.00659
Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) 0.00685
- Links
Genes
Gene | OMIM | ClinGen Gene Dosage Sensitivity Curation |
Variation Viewer
Help
Links to Variation Viewer, a genome browser to view variation data from NCBI databases. |
Related variants | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI score
Help
The haploinsufficiency score for the gene, curated by ClinGen’s Dosage Sensitivity Curation task team. |
TS score
Help
The triplosensitivity score for the gene, curated by ClinGen’s Dosage Sensitivity Curation task team. |
Within gene
Help
The number of variants in ClinVar that are contained within this gene, with a link to view the list of variants. |
All
Help
The number of variants in ClinVar for this gene, including smaller variants within the gene and larger CNVs that overlap or fully contain the gene. |
|||
PRODH | - | - |
GRCh38 GRCh37 |
380 | 798 |
Conditions - Germline
Condition
Help
The condition for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. |
Classification
Help
The aggregate germline classification for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. The number of submissions that contribute to this aggregate classification is shown in parentheses. (# of submissions) |
Review status
Help
The aggregate review status for this variant-condition (RCV) record in ClinVar. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from submitters. Read our rules for calculating the review status. |
Last evaluated
Help
The most recent date that a submitter evaluated this variant for the condition. |
Variation/condition record
Help
The RCV accession number, with most recent version number, for the variant-condition record, with a link to the RCV web page. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pathogenic (2) |
criteria provided, single submitter
|
Jan 27, 2020 | RCV000004219.8 | |
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (7) |
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
|
Mar 25, 2024 | RCV000004218.21 | |
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (4) |
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
|
Dec 1, 2023 | RCV000412946.24 | |
Pathogenic (1) |
criteria provided, single submitter
|
Dec 28, 2020 | RCV002512743.5 | |
Uncertain significance (1) |
criteria provided, single submitter
|
Apr 17, 2024 | RCV004585983.1 |
Submissions - Germline
Classification
Help
The submitted germline classification for each SCV record. (Last evaluated) |
Review status
Help
Stars represent the review status, or the level of review supporting the submitted (SCV) record. This value is calculated by NCBI based on data from the submitter. Read our rules for calculating the review status. This column also includes a link to the submitter’s assertion criteria if provided, and the collection method. (Assertion criteria) |
Condition
Help
The condition for the classification, provided by the submitter for this submitted (SCV) record. This column also includes the affected status and allele origin of individuals observed with this variant. |
Submitter
Help
The submitting organization for this submitted (SCV) record. This column also includes the SCV accession and version number, the date this SCV first appeared in ClinVar, and the date that this SCV was last updated in ClinVar. |
More information
Help
This column includes more information supporting the classification, including citations, the comment on classification, and detailed evidence provided as observations of the variant by the submitter. |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Likely pathogenic
(May 19, 2017)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not provided
Affected status: not provided
Allele origin:
germline
|
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Accession: SCV000609760.1
First in ClinVar: Jan 09, 2017 Last updated: Jan 09, 2017 |
|
|
Pathogenic
(Jan 27, 2020)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Schizophrenia 4
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Accession: SCV001367549.2
First in ClinVar: Jul 04, 2020 Last updated: Dec 12, 2020 |
Comment:
This variant was classified as: Pathogenic. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PS1,PS3,PM3,PP4. This variant was detected in homozygous state.
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Apr 29, 2022)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
MGZ Medical Genetics Center
Accession: SCV002581198.1
First in ClinVar: Oct 15, 2022 Last updated: Oct 15, 2022
Comment:
ACMG criteria applied: PS3_MOD, PM3_SUP, PP3, BS2
|
Number of individuals with the variant: 1
Sex: male
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Nov 01, 2022)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Accession: SCV000631841.5
First in ClinVar: Dec 26, 2017 Last updated: Feb 07, 2023 |
Comment:
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 441 of the PRODH protein (p.Leu441Pro). … (more)
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 441 of the PRODH protein (p.Leu441Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs2904551, gnomAD 0.6%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with type I hyperprolinemia and has been reported to be associated with neurological manifestations when present in the homozygous state. It is also reported to present at a higher frequency in affected individuals than unaffected controls in a small cohort from the French population (PMID: 12217952, 20524212). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 4008). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt PRODH protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects PRODH function (PMID: 15662599). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. (less)
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Aug 29, 2019)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Accession: SCV003812366.2
First in ClinVar: Mar 04, 2023 Last updated: Feb 04, 2024 |
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Mar 25, 2024)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
Accession: SCV004806107.1
First in ClinVar: Apr 06, 2024 Last updated: Apr 06, 2024 |
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Dec 01, 2023)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not provided
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Accession: SCV000493699.23
First in ClinVar: Jan 09, 2017 Last updated: Oct 20, 2024 |
Comment:
PRODH: PP3, PS3:Supporting, PS4:Supporting
Number of individuals with the variant: 4
|
|
Likely pathogenic
(Mar 15, 2016)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Not Provided
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
GeneDx
Accession: SCV000490742.1
First in ClinVar: Jan 09, 2017 Last updated: Jan 09, 2017 |
Comment:
The L441P variant in the PRODH gene has been reported previously in association with hyperprolinemia type I (Jacquet et al., 2002). The NHLBI ESP Exome … (more)
The L441P variant in the PRODH gene has been reported previously in association with hyperprolinemia type I (Jacquet et al., 2002). The NHLBI ESP Exome Sequencing Project reports L441P was observed in 58/8600 alleles from individuals of European-American background, with no homozygous individuals reported. The L441P variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. Functional studies show that the L441P variant leads to reduced stability of proline oxidase and significant reduction in its activity (Bender et al., 2005). The L441P variant is a strong candidate for a pathogenic variant, however the possibility it may be a rare benign variant cannot be excluded. (less)
|
|
Likely pathogenic
(May 22, 2022)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
3billion
Accession: SCV002521468.1
First in ClinVar: Jun 03, 2022 Last updated: Jun 03, 2022 |
Comment:
In silico prediction tools and conservation analysis predicted that this variant was probably damaging to the protein structure/function (REVEL: 0.732>=0.6, 3CNET: 0.975>=0.75). A missense variant … (more)
In silico prediction tools and conservation analysis predicted that this variant was probably damaging to the protein structure/function (REVEL: 0.732>=0.6, 3CNET: 0.975>=0.75). A missense variant is a common mechanism associated with Hyperprolinemia, type I. Amino acid change identical to known pathogenic variant has been previously reported with established evidence (ClinVar ID: VCV000004008, PMID:12217952). Therefore, this variant is classified as likely pathogenic according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. (less)
Clinical Features:
EEG abnormality (present) , Seizure (present) , Hand tremor (present) , Hyperprolinemia (present) , Hypertensive crisis (present) , Myoclonus (present) , Myoclonus (present) , Pigmentary … (more)
EEG abnormality (present) , Seizure (present) , Hand tremor (present) , Hyperprolinemia (present) , Hypertensive crisis (present) , Myoclonus (present) , Myoclonus (present) , Pigmentary retinopathy (present) (less)
|
|
Pathogenic
(Dec 28, 2020)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
Inborn genetic diseases
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Ambry Genetics
Accession: SCV003689836.2
First in ClinVar: Feb 07, 2023 Last updated: May 01, 2024 |
Comment:
The c.1322T>C (p.L441P) alteration is located in exon 12 (coding exon 11) of the PRODH gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution … (more)
The c.1322T>C (p.L441P) alteration is located in exon 12 (coding exon 11) of the PRODH gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1322, causing the leucine (L) at amino acid position 441 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) database, the PRODH c.1322T>C alteration was observed in 0.52% (1454/281208) of total alleles studied, with a frequency of 0.65% (231/35338) in the Latino subpopulation. This alteration has been reported in the homozygous state as well as in trans with other alterations in patients with hyperprolinemia who also had neurological symptoms (Jacquet, 2002; Afenjar, 2007; Guilmatre, 2010). This alteration was significantly associated with hyperprolinemia in a case-control study (Jacquet, 2005). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Functional studies demonstrate that this alteration results in a severe reduction of proline oxidase (POX) activity and reduced stability (Zhang, 2004; Bender, 2005). The in silico prediction for the p.L441P alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, this alteration is classified as pathogenic. (less)
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Apr 17, 2024)
|
criteria provided, single submitter
Method: clinical testing
|
not specified
Affected status: unknown
Allele origin:
germline
|
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Accession: SCV005077682.1
First in ClinVar: Jul 15, 2024 Last updated: Jul 15, 2024 |
Comment:
Variant summary: PRODH c.1322T>C (p.Leu441Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a damaging … (more)
Variant summary: PRODH c.1322T>C (p.Leu441Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0052 in 249888 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. c.1322T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Proline Dehydrogenase Deficiency, hyperprolinemia and autistic feature (example, Jacquet_2002, Minardi_2020, Raux_2007). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Proline Dehydrogenase Deficiency. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in less than 10% of enzymatic activity WT in vitro and inability to increase intracellular ROS levels (Nagano_2017). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 12217952, 32725632, 28264926, 17135275). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 4008). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. (less)
|
|
Pathogenic
(Mar 01, 2005)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: literature only
|
HYPERPROLINEMIA, TYPE I
Affected status: not provided
Allele origin:
germline
|
OMIM
Accession: SCV000024384.2
First in ClinVar: Apr 04, 2013 Last updated: Mar 16, 2015 |
Comment on evidence:
In a patient with hyperprolinemia (HYRPRO1; 239500) and schizophrenia-4 (SCZD4; 600850), Jacquet et al. (2002) identified heterozygosity for a leu441-to-pro (L441P) mutation in the PRODH … (more)
In a patient with hyperprolinemia (HYRPRO1; 239500) and schizophrenia-4 (SCZD4; 600850), Jacquet et al. (2002) identified heterozygosity for a leu441-to-pro (L441P) mutation in the PRODH gene. Two relatives with schizophrenia also carried the L441P mutation and had abnormal plasma proline levels; the relative with the highest level of prolinemia was compound heterozygous for L441P and an arg431-to-his mutation (R431H; 606810.0007). In 2 unrelated patients with severe type I hyperprolinemia with neurologic manifestations, Jacquet et al. (2002) identified a homozygous L441P mutation. One of the patients, originally reported by Humbertclaude et al. (2001), also had a heterozygous arg453-to-cys substitution (R453C; 606810.0002). Bender et al. (2005) found that the L441P mutation was associated with a severe (more than 70%) reduction in PRODH activity. (less)
|
|
risk factor
(Mar 01, 2005)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: literature only
|
SCHIZOPHRENIA, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 4
Affected status: not provided
Allele origin:
germline
|
OMIM
Accession: SCV000024385.2
First in ClinVar: Apr 04, 2013 Last updated: Mar 16, 2015 |
Comment on evidence:
In a patient with hyperprolinemia (HYRPRO1; 239500) and schizophrenia-4 (SCZD4; 600850), Jacquet et al. (2002) identified heterozygosity for a leu441-to-pro (L441P) mutation in the PRODH … (more)
In a patient with hyperprolinemia (HYRPRO1; 239500) and schizophrenia-4 (SCZD4; 600850), Jacquet et al. (2002) identified heterozygosity for a leu441-to-pro (L441P) mutation in the PRODH gene. Two relatives with schizophrenia also carried the L441P mutation and had abnormal plasma proline levels; the relative with the highest level of prolinemia was compound heterozygous for L441P and an arg431-to-his mutation (R431H; 606810.0007). In 2 unrelated patients with severe type I hyperprolinemia with neurologic manifestations, Jacquet et al. (2002) identified a homozygous L441P mutation. One of the patients, originally reported by Humbertclaude et al. (2001), also had a heterozygous arg453-to-cys substitution (R453C; 606810.0002). Bender et al. (2005) found that the L441P mutation was associated with a severe (more than 70%) reduction in PRODH activity. (less)
|
|
Uncertain significance
(Apr 01, 2023)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
Proline dehydrogenase deficiency
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
germline
|
Clinical Laboratory Sciences Program (CLSP), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
Accession: SCV003927898.1
First in ClinVar: Sep 16, 2023 Last updated: Sep 16, 2023 |
|
|
Uncertain significance
(-)
|
no assertion criteria provided
Method: clinical testing
|
not provided
Affected status: yes
Allele origin:
unknown
|
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Additional submitter:
Franklin by Genoox
Study: The Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR)
Accession: SCV001554073.1 First in ClinVar: Apr 13, 2021 Last updated: Apr 13, 2021 |
Comment:
The PRODH p.Leu441Pro variant was identified in 4 of 934 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0043) from individuals or families with schizophrenia (Jacquet_2002_PMID:12217952; Jacquet_2005_PMID:1549470). This variant was … (more)
The PRODH p.Leu441Pro variant was identified in 4 of 934 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0043) from individuals or families with schizophrenia (Jacquet_2002_PMID:12217952; Jacquet_2005_PMID:1549470). This variant was also identified as a homozygous variant in two unrelated children with severe type I hyperprolinemia with neurological manifestations (Jacquet_2002_PMID:12217952). In transient transfection assays, this variant was found to severely (>70%) reduce POX activity (Bender_2005_PMID:15662599). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2904551), LOVD 3.0 (classified as a VUS and pathogenic) and ClinVar (classified as likely pathogenic by GeneDx, Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics and CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen, and as uncertain significance by Invitae for Proline dehydrogenase deficiency). The variant was identified in control databases in 1454 of 281208 chromosomes (13 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005171 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 231 of 35338 chromosomes (freq: 0.006537), Other in 46 of 7194 chromosomes (freq: 0.006394), East Asian in 117 of 19810 chromosomes (freq: 0.005906), Ashkenazi Jewish in 57 of 10298 chromosomes (freq: 0.005535), European (non-Finnish) in 639 of 128296 chromosomes (freq: 0.004981), African in 118 of 24764 chromosomes (freq: 0.004765), South Asian in 136 of 30462 chromosomes (freq: 0.004465), and European (Finnish) in 110 of 25046 chromosomes (freq: 0.004392). The p.Leu441 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. (less)
|
|
click to load more click to collapse |
Germline Functional Evidence
There is no functional evidence in ClinVar for this variation. If you have generated functional data for this variation, please consider submitting that data to ClinVar. |
Citations for germline classification of this variant
HelpTitle | Author | Journal | Year | Link |
---|---|---|---|---|
Whole-exome sequencing in adult patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: It is never too late. | Minardi R | Clinical genetics | 2020 | PMID: 32725632 |
Proline dehydrogenase promotes senescence through the generation of reactive oxygen species. | Nagano T | Journal of cell science | 2017 | PMID: 28264926 |
Type I hyperprolinemia: genotype/phenotype correlations. | Guilmatre A | Human mutation | 2010 | PMID: 20524212 |
Early neurological phenotype in 4 children with biallelic PRODH mutations. | Afenjar A | Brain & development | 2007 | PMID: 17412540 |
Involvement of hyperprolinemia in cognitive and psychiatric features of the 22q11 deletion syndrome. | Raux G | Human molecular genetics | 2007 | PMID: 17135275 |
Functional consequences of PRODH missense mutations. | Bender HU | American journal of human genetics | 2005 | PMID: 15662599 |
Hyperprolinemia is a risk factor for schizoaffective disorder. | Jacquet H | Molecular psychiatry | 2005 | PMID: 15494707 |
Structures of the Escherichia coli PutA proline dehydrogenase domain in complex with competitive inhibitors. | Zhang M | Biochemistry | 2004 | PMID: 15449943 |
PRODH mutations and hyperprolinemia in a subset of schizophrenic patients. | Jacquet H | Human molecular genetics | 2002 | PMID: 12217952 |
Is hyperprolinemia type I actually a benign trait? Report of a case with severe neurologic involvement and vigabatrin intolerance. | Humbertclaude V | Journal of child neurology | 2001 | PMID: 11510941 |
Text-mined citations for rs2904551 ...
HelpRecord last updated Oct 20, 2024
This date represents the last time this VCV record was updated. The update may be due to an update to one of the included submitted records (SCVs), or due to an update that ClinVar made to the variant such as adding HGVS expressions or a rs number. So this date may be different from the date of the “most recent submission” reported at the top of this page.