U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Nolte E, Groenewegen P. How can we transfer service and policy innovations between health systems? [Internet] Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2021. (Policy Brief, No. 40.)

Cover of How can we transfer service and policy innovations between health systems?

How can we transfer service and policy innovations between health systems? [Internet]

Show details

References

  • Aguiar de Sousa D, et al. Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: a survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries. European Stroke Journal. 2019;4(1):13–28. [PMC free article: PMC6533860] [PubMed: 31165091]
  • Ammi M, Fortier G. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 178. 2017. The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: a critical review; pp. 157–166. [PubMed: 28226301]
  • Baker T, Walker C. Introduction: the centrality of arenas, agents and actions. In: Baker T, Walker C, editors. Public policy circulation: Arenas, agents and actions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019. pp. 2–25. In.
  • Barber R, et al. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):231–266. [PMC free article: PMC5528124] [PubMed: 28528753]
  • Barriball L, et al. Recruitment and retention of the health workforce in Europe. Brussels: European Commission; 2015. (https://ec​.europa.eu​/health/workforce/key_documents​/recruitment_retention_en, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Cacace M, et al. Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: towards a set of generic quality criteria. Health Policy. 2013;112(1–2):156–162. [PubMed: 23628482]
  • Chulis GS. Assessing Medicare’s prospective payment system for hospitals. Medical Care Review. 1991;48(2):167–206. [PubMed: 10113662]
  • Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on common values and principles in European Union Health Systems. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union (2006/C 146/01). 2006
  • Cour des comptes. Le coût du dossier médical personnel depuis sa mise en place. Paris: Cour des Comptes; 2012. Communication à la Commission des Finances de l’Assemblée Rationale. (https://www​.ccomptes​.fr/fr/documents/24427, accessed 18 May 2018)
  • Dalkin S, et al. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science: IS. 2015;10(49) doi​.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x. [PMC free article: PMC4408605] [PubMed: 25885787]
  • Dearing J. Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management Practice. 2008;14:99–108. [PubMed: 18287914]
  • Dearing JW, Cox JG. Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs. 2018;37(2):183–190. [PubMed: 29401011]
  • Dobrow M, et al. The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;63(7):1811–1824. [PubMed: 16764980]
  • Dolowitz D, Marsh D. Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2000;3(1):5–24.
  • Elshaug A, et al. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):191–202. [PubMed: 28077228]
  • Elstad JI. Income inequality and foregone medical care in Europe during The Great Recession: multilevel analyses of EU-SILC surveys 2008–2013. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2016;15:101. [PMC free article: PMC4936318] [PubMed: 27388561]
  • European Commission. Communication from the Commission. On effective, accessible and resilient health systems. Brussels: European Commission; 2014. (https://ec​.europa.eu​/health//sites/health​/files/healthcare/docs​/com2014_215_final_en.pdf, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Furnival J, Boaden R, Walshe K. Conceptualizing and assessing improvement capability: a review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2017;29(5):604–611. [PMC free article: PMC5890875] [PubMed: 28992146]
  • Geissler A, et al. Introduction to DRGs in Europe: Common objectives across different hospital systems. In: Busse R, et al., editors. Diganosis-Related Groups in Europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011. pp. 9–22. In.
  • Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Innovationsfonds [Innovation Fund]. Berlin: Federal Joint Committee; 2019. (https:​//innovationsfonds.g-ba.de, accessed 29 November 2019)
  • Godin B. Innovation: The history of a category. Montreal: Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation; 2008. Working Paper No 1. (http://www​.csiic.ca/PDF/IntellectualNo1​.pdf, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Godin B. The vocabulary of innovation: a lexicon. Montreal: Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation; 2014. Working Paper No 20.
  • Gravelle H, et al. Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. BMJ. 2007;334(7583):31. [PMC free article: PMC1764106] [PubMed: 17107984]
  • Green E. Innovation: The history of a buzzword. The Atlantic. 2013. (https://www​.theatlantic​.com/business/archive​/2013/06/innovation-the-history-of-a-buzzword/277067, accessed 23 January 2017)
  • Greenhalgh T, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly. 2004a;82(4):581–629. [PMC free article: PMC2690184] [PubMed: 15595944]
  • Greenhalgh T, et al. How to spread good ideas. A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. London: University College London; 2004b. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO)
  • Greenhalgh T, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19(11):e367. [PMC free article: PMC5688245] [PubMed: 29092808]
  • Hansen J, et al. What are the key priority areas where European health systems can learn from each other? Policy Brief 41. Brussels: European Union, TO-REACH project; 2021.
  • Harvey G, et al. Absorptive capacity in a non-market environment: a knowledge-based approach to analyzing the performance of public sector organizations. Public Management Review. 2010;12(1) doi​.org/10.1080/14719030902817923.
  • Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1983.
  • Kimberly J, de Pouvourville G, D’Aunno T. Conclusions: The global diffusion of casemix. In: Kimberly J, de Pouvourville G, D’Aunno T, editors. The globalization of managerial innovation in health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 346–372. In.
  • Klein R. Learning from others: shall the last be the first? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1997;22(5):1267–78. [PubMed: 9394248]
  • Lagarde M, Huicho L, Papanicolas I. Motivating provision of high quality care: it is not all about the money. BMJ. 2019;366:l5210. [PMC free article: PMC6753666] [PubMed: 31548200]
  • Lennon MR, et al. Readiness for delivering digital health at scale: lessons from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of a national digital health innovation program in the United Kingdom. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19(2):e42. [PMC free article: PMC5334516] [PubMed: 28209558]
  • Lovell H. Policy failure mobilities. Progress in Human Geography. 2019;43(1):46–63.
  • Mair F, et al. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2012;90(5):357–364. [PMC free article: PMC3341692] [PubMed: 22589569]
  • Marmor TR. Comparative studies and the drawing of policy lessons: describing, explaining, evaluating, and predicting. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2017;19(4):313–326.
  • Marmor T, Freeman R, Okma K. Comparative perspectives and policy learning in the world of health care. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 2005;7(4):331–348.
  • Mateus C. Casemix implementation in Portugal. In: Kimberly J, de Pouvourville G, D’Aunno T, editors. The globalization of managerial innovation in health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 51–72. In.
  • Mateus C. Portugal: Results of 25 years of experience with DRGs. In: Busse R, et al., editors. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011. pp. 381–400. In.
  • Mayes R. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare’s revolutionary prospective payment system. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 2007;62(1):21–55. [PubMed: 16467485]
  • McCann E, Ward K. Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review. 2012;10(3):325–332.
  • McDaid D. Using economic evidence to help make the case for investing in health promotion and disease prevention. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. (https://www​.euro.who​.int/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0003/380730/pb-tallinn-02-eng​.pdf, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Mechanic D. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 1. 1975. The comparative study of health care delivery systems; pp. 43–65. [PubMed: 12264582]
  • Mendelson A, et al. The effects of pay-for-performance programs on health, health care use, and processes of care: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2017;166(5):341–353. [PubMed: 28114600]
  • Ministry of Social Affairs. Research and innovation for health. Research, development and innovation strategy for the Estonian health system 2015–2020. Tallinn: Ministry of Social Affairs of Estonia; 2015. (https://www​.sm.ee/sites​/default/files/content-editors​/eesmargid_ja_tegevused​/Tervis​/strategy_research​_and_innovation_for_health.pdf, accessed 29 November 2019)
  • Morris S, et al. Impact and sustainability of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics and stroke national audit data. BMJ. 2019;364 doi​.org/10.1136/bmj.l1. [PMC free article: PMC6334718] [PubMed: 30674465]
  • Mountin JW, Perrott G St J. Health insurance programs and plans of western Europe: a summary of observations. Public Health Reports. 1947;62(11):369–399. [PubMed: 20341631]
  • Moyson S, Scholten P, Weible CM. Policy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives. Policy & Society. 2017;36(2):161–177.
  • NHS England. Innovation. 2018. (https://www​.england.nhs​.uk/ourwork/innovation, accessed 29 November 2019)
  • Nolte E. How do we ensure that innovation in health service delivery and organization is implemented, sustained and spread? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. (https://www​.euro.who​.int/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0004/380731/pb-tallinn-03-eng​.pdf, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Nolte E, Knai C, Saltman R, editors. Assessing chronic disease management in European health systems. Concepts and approaches. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014. (https://www​.euro.who​.int/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0009/270729/Assessing-chronic-disease-management-in-European-health-systems.pdf, accessed 24 January 2021) [PubMed: 29019637]
  • Nolte E, McKee M. Integration and chronic care: A review. In: Nolte E, McKee M, editors. Caring for people with chronic conditions: A health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008. pp. 64–91. In.
  • Nolte E, et al. Learning from other countries: an on-call facility for health care policy. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2008;13 Suppl. 2:58–64. [PubMed: 18416931]
  • Nolte E, et al. Evaluating chronic disease management. Recommendations for funders and users. Santa Monica/Cambridge: RAND Corporation; 2012. (https://www​.rand.org​/pubs/technical_reports/TR1213.html, accessed 25 January 2021)
  • Obinger H, Schmitt C, Starke P. Policy diffusion and policy transfer in comparative welfare state research. Social Policy Administration. 2013;47(1):111–129.
  • OECD. Towards high-performing health systems. Paris: The OECD Health Project; 2004. (http://www​.oecd.org/health​/health-systems​/towardshigh-performinghealthsystems​.htm, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • OECD. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2005. Oslo Manual. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. (https://www​.oecd.org​/science/inno/2367614.pdf, accessed 23 January 2018)
  • Osborne SP. Naming the beast: defining and classifying service innovations in social policy. Human Relations. 1998;51(9):1133–1154.
  • Osborne SP, Brown L. Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration. 2011;89(4):1335–1350.
  • Patient Classification Systems International. Patient Classification Systems International (PCSI). 2008. (http:​//pcsinternational.org/about, accessed 28 September 2018)
  • Pendharkar SR, et al. What happens when healthcare innovations collide? BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25(1):9–13. [PMC free article: PMC5028195] [PubMed: 26271920]
  • Pfadenhauer LM, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implementation Science: IS. 2017;12(1):21. [PMC free article: PMC5312531] [PubMed: 28202031]
  • Porto de Oliveira O. Policy ambassadors: human agency in the transnationalization of Brazilian social policies. Policy & Society. 2020;39(1) doi​.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1643646.
  • Porto de Oliveira O, Pal L. New frontiers and directions in policy transfer, diffusion and circulation research: agents, spaces, resistance, and translations. Brazilian Journal of Public Admininstration. 2018;52(2):199–220.
  • Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd edn. New York: The Free Press; 1983.
  • Rose R. What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy. 1991;11(1):3–30.
  • Russell GM, et al. Contextual levers for team-based primary care: lessons from reform interventions in five jurisdictions in three countries. Family Practice. 2017;35(3) [PMC free article: PMC5965082] [PubMed: 29069376] [CrossRef]
  • Saltman R, Dubois H. The historical and social base of social health insurance systems. In: Saltman R, Busse R, Figueras J, editors. Social health insurance systems in western Europe. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004. pp. 21–32. In.
  • Sener S, Hacioglu V, Akdemir A. Invention and innovation in economic change. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting. 2017;4(2):203–208.
  • Sigerist HE. From Bismarck to Beveridge: developments and trends in social security legislation. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1943;13(4):365–388.
  • Standing C, et al. The paradoxes of telehealth: a review of the literature 2000–2015. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2016;35(1):90–101.
  • Stokes J. Effectiveness of case management for ’at risk’ patients in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132340. [PMC free article: PMC4505905] [PubMed: 26186598]
  • Stone D. Understanding the transfer of policy failure: bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy & Politics. 2017;45(1):55–70.
  • Stone D, Porto de Oliveira O, Pal LA. Transnational policy transfer: the circulation of ideas, power and development models. Policy and Society. 2019;39(1):1–18.
  • Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;9:CD000197. [PMC free article: PMC6474318] [PubMed: 24026639]
  • Toivonen M, Tuominen T. Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal. 2009;29(7):887–902.
  • Trieu K, et al. Salt reduction initiatives around the world – a systematic review of progress towards the global target. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0130247. [PMC free article: PMC4511674] [PubMed: 26201031]
  • Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE. Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promotion International. 2006;21:76–83. [PubMed: 16249192]
  • Weinerman ER. Research on comparative health service systems. Medical Care. 1971;9(3):272–290. [PubMed: 4934952]
  • WHO. World Health Report 2000 – Health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. (https://www​.who.int/whr/2000/en, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • WHO European Ministerial Conference on Health Systems. The Tallinn Charter: Health Systems for Health and Wealth. 2008. Tallinn, Estonia, 25–27 June 2008 (http://www​.euro.who.int​/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0008/88613/E91438.pdf?ua=1, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe. European health report 2018: More than numbers – evidence for all. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. (http://www​.euro.who.int​/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0008/379862/who-ehr-2018-eng​.pdf?ua=1, accessed 24 January 2021)
  • Wiley M. Hospital financing reform and case-mix measurement: an international review. Health Care Financing Review. 1992;13(4):119–133. [PMC free article: PMC4193254] [PubMed: 10122001]
  • Wiley M. From the origins of DRGs to their implementation in Europe. In: Busse R, et al., editors. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011. pp. 3–8. In.
  • Wilson PM, Boaden R, Harvey G. Plans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25(8):572–576. [PMC free article: PMC4975842] [PubMed: 26700544]
  • Witell L, et al. Defining service innovation: a review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research. 2016;69(8):2863–2872.
© World Health Organization 2021 (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies)
Bookshelf ID: NBK571996

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.2M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...