Table 6Accuracy of manifestations in predicting Cerebral Palsy in infants and children in the primary care setting or mixed (low risk and high risk) population

Quality assessmentSummary of findingsQualityImportance
NumberDiagnostic accuracyTrue positive
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasIndirectnessOtherSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)AUC (95% CI)Proportion / %
Definitely abnormal general movements1, assessed by video recording of spontaneous motility in the supine position for at least 5 minutes at corrected age of 3 months| follow up until 3 years 9 months
1 (Bouwstra 2010)prosp. cohortno serious risk of biasno serious indirectnessnonen = 45567% (13–98)97% (94–98)12% (2–38)100% (99–100)NR3/4552HIGHCRITICAL
Neonatal neurological examination adapted from Prechtl 1977 with added predictors3 at term or by latest 5 days after birth. Reference test: Bayley Scale of Infant Development (BSID) (Bayley 1969)
1 (Wolf, 1997)prosp cohortno serious risk of biasserious4noneN = 14273.9 (51.6–89.7)98.1 (93.3–99.7)89.5 (66.8–98.4)94.5 (88.4–97.9)NR23/1425MODERATECRITICAL
1

definitely abnormal general movements characterised by a serious reduction in movement variation and complexity

2

2 with bilateral spastic CP, 1 with unilateral left-sided spastic CP.

3

Contains predictors including variation of movement, fixation, fluctuating tone, nasogastric tube feeding, irritability and consolability.

4

Study conducted in a less resource rich country (Zimbabwe).

5

16 with quadriplegia, 2 with diplegia, 1 with hemiplegia and 4 with choreoathetosis

From: Appendix H, GRADE Tables

Cover of Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management
Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management.
NICE Guideline, No. 62.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
Copyright National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.